§ discipline
‹ Browse decisions

Andrew William Densham

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number8947/2003
Date01/01/2003
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, Others

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 12,637
Dishonesty foundNo

Andrew William Densham, a sole practitioner trading as Phoenix Solicitors, faced multiple allegations of conduct unbefitting a solicitor including accounts rules breaches, practising without a certificate, failing to file accountant's reports, false statements about professional indemnity insurance, and failure to comply with adjudicator/court directions. He ultimately admitted all allegations but denied dishonesty. The Applicant put the case as one of dishonesty, but the Tribunal's findings characterised the conduct as gross mismanagement and 'highly improper practices which had compromised the Respondent's integrity' without an express finding of dishonesty. The Tribunal found all allegations substantiated, struck him off the Roll, ordered costs of £12,636.68, and made the Adjudicator's £850 direction to Mr L enforceable as a High Court order.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Wholesale breach of almost every regulatory requirement imposed on solicitors
  • Misconduct at the most serious end of the scale
  • Minimum cash shortage on client account of £15,460.21 not shown to be replaced
  • Persistent failure to cooperate or respond to professional body
  • Misconduct compromised integrity and public confidence in the profession

Mitigating factors:

  • Eventually admitted all allegations
  • Apologised to the Law Society and the profession
  • Cited inexperienced support staff and a personal tragedy at time of inspection
  • No longer practising following intervention

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/8947/