§ discipline
‹ Browse decisions

Ms Vanessa Marie FARMER

JurisdictionAustralia — Northern Territory
BodyLaw Society Northern Territory (LSNT)
Professionlawyer — 22 Harry Chan Ave, Darwin NT 0800 NT Jurisdiction
Date30/08/2019
OutcomePublic reprimand in respect of each charge Fine of $15,000 Complete further legal education in the areas of Ethics and Professional Responsibility and Practice Management, course not exceeding one day or equivalent online program Transfer trust money to the complainant within 7 days

Allegation / charges

Findings of professional misconduct Reasons for decision Reasons for penalty

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionReprimand
FineAUD 15,000
CostsAUD 40,000
Dishonesty foundNo

Vanessa Marie Farmer, acting for the wife in family law proceedings, held net sale proceeds of $32,097.29 in Withnalls Trust Account under a Federal Circuit Court consent order requiring disbursement only by joint written instruction or court order. When the parties jointly directed payment of all funds to the complainant husband, she refused, disbursed $16,000 (roughly 50%) and later retained the balance, obtaining a Local Court costs order in the wrong venue to claim a purported lien for her fees. The Tribunal found she breached s247 of the Legal Profession Act (recklessly) and Order 2 of the FCC order, constituting professional misconduct through a substantial failure to reach a reasonable standard of competence. No dishonesty was found - conduct was reckless, clouded by her view of the complainant. She was publicly reprimanded on each charge, fined $15,000, ordered to undertake further legal education, pay $40,000 costs, and pay the $16,097.74 to the complainant.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Conduct contested through hearing with approach diametrically opposed to remorse later expressed
  • Previous disciplinary matters (though at lower end of spectrum)
  • Substantial failure to appreciate the legal effect of a court order she had personally obtained

Mitigating factors:

  • Not motivated by improper purpose; reckless rather than dishonest conduct
  • Full acceptance of Tribunal findings and remorse expressed post-decision
  • Thirteen strong character references from legal colleagues describing her as hardworking, competent and committed to pro bono and legal aid work
  • Conduct out of character
  • No further complaints since 2015
  • Unlikely to recover substantial fees owed for legal work
  • Restored the funds to trust account

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://lawsocietynt.asn.au/index.php/disciplinary-action-register-public-reprimands/