Skip to main content
discipline 4 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Waheed Ur Rehman Mian

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number12646/2024
Date14/04/2025
OutcomeSuspend - Fixed Period

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, Failures, SRA Principles 2011

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionSuspension
Suspension6 months
CostsGBP 40,218
Dishonesty foundNo

The Respondent, a solicitor and senior member/COLP/COFA of M-R Solicitors LLP, acted for clients purchasing off-plan properties from Aronex, a developer with significant undisclosed connections to the Firm (his wife was a director, Firm was landlord, and other Firm employees were involved). He failed to disclose the conflict of interest, failed to adequately advise clients of the risks of off-plan buyer-led investment schemes, failed to inform clients of planning permission issues before releasing funds, and failed to supervise a junior trainee. Aronex collapsed and investors lost deposits. The Tribunal found all allegations proved, including contested breaches of Principles 2 (integrity) and 3 (independence), rejecting his new defence that he was unaware of his wife's directorship. The Tribunal found lack of integrity but no dishonesty was alleged or found. He was suspended for 6 months and ordered to pay costs of £40,218.40.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Misconduct continued over a period exceeding two years
  • Respondent knew or ought reasonably to have known conduct was in material breach of obligations
  • Presented a new, fundamentally flawed defence during the hearing
  • Lack of insight regarding misconduct
  • Financial motivation found by the Tribunal

Mitigating factors:

  • Cooperated with the regulator throughout the investigation
  • Faced significant increase in professional indemnity insurance premium
  • No previous disciplinary history
  • Made efforts to ensure clients were compensated including through insurers
  • Positive character references

Codes & rules applied

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/12646/