§ discipline
‹ Back

Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number12639/2024
Date21/03/2025
OutcomeFine

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, Code of Conduct for Firms 2019, Money Laundering Regulations, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionFine
FineGBP 300,000
CostsGBP 62,000
Dishonesty foundNo

Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, the relevant person with responsibility for AML compliance, admitted three allegations arising from an SRA AML supervision review: failing to have a firm-wide risk assessment (Reg 18), failing to have fully compliant policies/controls/procedures (Reg 19), and failing to have compliant client/matter risk assessments on four files (Reg 28). No actual harm and low risk of money laundering were found, but prolonged non-compliance risked harm to the profession's reputation. No dishonesty alleged or found. By Agreed Outcome the Tribunal imposed a £300,000 fine and £62,000 costs.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Length of time for which the breaches continued
  • A firm of its size and resources ought reasonably to have known the misconduct was a material breach of its obligations

Mitigating factors:

  • Full cooperation with the investigation
  • Early admission of misconduct, avoiding a contested hearing
  • Actively took steps to remedy the breaches
  • Unblemished regulatory record

Codes & rules applied

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/12639/