Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Neil Bromley

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number10590/2010
Date01/01/2010
OutcomeS.43 Order (clerks)

Allegation / charges

Client Money

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionOther
CostsGBP 18,446
Dishonesty foundYes

Neil Bromley, an unadmitted conveyancer employed by Rutherfords Solicitors, misappropriated and manipulated client funds using four methods (unofficial receipts, delayed banking, unofficial invoices, and unrecorded files) totalling £23,939.25 across 100 matters over about 15 months. The Tribunal found all allegations proved to the criminal standard and made an express finding of dishonesty. As he was unadmitted, the Tribunal made an order under s.43(2) of the Solicitors Act 1974 restricting his employment in the profession without Law Society permission, and ordered him to pay costs of £18,445.98. The Respondent did not appear and offered no mitigation.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Significant breach of trust
  • Determined to escape supervision
  • Used four distinct methods to manipulate money over approximately 15 months
  • Total of £23,939.25 misused across 100 matters
  • Attempted to cover his tracks by taking files home after being told of redundancy
  • Failed to engage with the investigation or proceedings

Mitigating factors:

  • Firm made repayments so no client suffered loss
  • Respondent may have repaid some of the manipulated sums

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/10590/