Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Malcolm Francis Turnbull

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number7402/1997
Date01/01/1997
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Failures, Others

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
Dishonesty foundNo

Malcolm Francis Turnbull, a solicitor admitted in 1973, faced four allegations arising from conveyancing/lending matters and dealings with his former partner. He admitted allegations (i)-(iii) and made a general admission of facts; the Tribunal found all four allegations substantiated. Failures included non-disclosure of a purchase-price variation to Halifax, acting despite conflicts of interest (notably relegating client Miss S's charge priority), misusing his firm's bridging facility with Barclays, and failing to disclose to his partner substantial borrowing that grew to about £300,000, leaving the partner facing a large claim. The applicant expressly did not allege dishonesty, and the Tribunal made no finding of dishonesty (though it found his conduct toward his partner was deceitful). Finding him not fit to be a solicitor, the Tribunal struck him off the Roll and ordered him to pay taxed costs, suspending filing of the Order for 14 days to permit an appeal.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Cavalier attitude in professional dealings
  • Preferred the interests of client Mr W at the expense of lender clients and of Miss S
  • Devastating consequences for his former partner Mr Williams, who was left facing a Barclays claim of about £250,000 following the respondent's bankruptcy
  • Substantial and undisclosed borrowing that grew to around £300,000

Mitigating factors:

  • No allegation or finding of dishonesty; not motivated by personal gain
  • No client monies placed in jeopardy
  • Full and prompt cooperation with the SCB/OSS and the applicant
  • Had ceased practising in July 1996 with no intention of returning to the profession
  • Genuine error of judgment; expressed remorse and apologised to former partner
  • Modest financial circumstances following bankruptcy

⚠ figures not found verbatim in the source were dropped: ["review_dishonesty_finding_cue_present"]

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/7402/