Decision record
Dominic D'Souza
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
Barrister Dominic D'Souza admitted three charges of professional misconduct after being covertly filmed drinking spirits from a bottle in his car in the Snaresbrook Crown Court car park during a break in a criminal trial on 29 March 2023. The Tribunal found his culpability low (he believed himself unobserved, drank little, and was unwell) and that no definable harm flowed from the culpable conduct, as it was a separate false allegation that led to his withdrawal and the jury's discharge. He was fined £1,000 on each charge (£3,000 total) and ordered to pay £2,670 costs. No dishonesty was found.
Duties found breached:
Aggravating factors:
- Seniority and experience of the respondent
- Failure to offer earlier factual admissions (initially claimed he was drinking Kombucha, only admitting brandy in November 2024)
Mitigating factors:
- One-off incident occurring when respondent was unwell
- Low future risk
- Drank only a small amount at a time when trial responsibilities were minimal; his prior court performance was impressive
- The disciplinary process (including more serious allegations) had significant adverse professional and personal impact
⚠ figures not found verbatim in the source were dropped: ["unverified_fine_amount=3000"]
Panel
Mr Tom Crowther KC (Chair); Mr Hylton Armstrong; Mr Geoffrey Brighton
Duties engaged
- Overriding duty to the court
- Not mislead the court
- Disclose adverse law to the court
- No abuse of process or coercive powers
- Avoid wasting the court's time
- Comply with and respect court orders
- Professional independence
- Personal probity and fitness to practise
- Uphold public trust in the profession
- Serve justice and improve the law
Documents
Source: https://www.tbtas.org.uk/hearings/findings-and-sentences-of-past-hearings/