Skip to main content
discipline 30 September 2026

The duty in context

No bribery or improper gifts integrity

The lawyer must ensure any gift or benefit complies with bribery, corruption and gift rules and must not give anything of value to a judge, juror or tribunal official in a pending matter.

872 cases 75% strike-off 2 with dishonesty finding

How the codes express this duty

E&W Solicitors SRA Principles & Code CCS 2.3; Principle 2 partial 855 cases
2.3 You do not provide or offer to provide any benefit to witnesses dependent upon the nature of their evidence or the outcome of the case. 1.2 in a way that upholds public trust and confidence in the solicitors' profession and in legal services provided by authorised persons.
E&W Barristers BSB Handbook gC18; gC19; gC30.2 partial 1 case
gC18 The following may reasonably be seen as compromising your independence in breach of Rule 8 ... .1 offering, promising or giving: .a any commission or referral fee ... or .b a gift (apart from items of modest value), to any client, professional client or other intermediary; gC30 ... .2 whether in a private or publicly funded case, a referral fee to which the client has not consented may constitute a bribe and therefore a criminal offence under the Bribery Act 2010;
Cayman Islands Legal Services Code 2026 R.7.9; R.10.1 strong
An attorney-at-law shall ensure that any gratuitous benefit received from a client, whether monetary or non-monetary, is compliant with applicable legislation on bribery and corruption, and any other regulation applicable to attorneys-at-law and recognised law entities in respect of gifts.
AU Solicitors Solicitors' Conduct Rules no clear equivalent
AU Barristers Uniform Barristers Rules r45 partial 7 cases
A barrister may not give a commission or gift to any person by reason of or in connection with the introduction of professional work by that person to the barrister.
IE Solicitors Law Society Guide Ch3 — Prohibition on payments to clients; Ch6 — Inducements partial
A solicitor should not, directly, or indirectly, make or offer to make any payment to or on behalf of any person as an inducement to obtain or retain instructions... A solicitor must not encourage or offer inducements to any third party with a view to obtaining instructions from any person.
IE Barristers Bar Code of Conduct no clear equivalent
JM Attorneys Canons of Professional Ethics Canon V(h) strong
An Attorney shall not give, lend or promise anything of value to a Judge, juror or official of a tribunal before which there is a pending matter in which he is engaged.
JE Lawyers Law Society of Jersey Code R.6.9 partial
This Rule applies alongside, and is without prejudice to, applicable legislation on bribery and corruption, and the requirement on a firm to keep a register of gifts.
ON Lawyers LSO Rules of Prof. Conduct r 5.1-2(d) partial
When acting as an advocate, a lawyer shall not ... endeavour or allow anyone else to endeavour, directly or indirectly, to influence the decision or action of a tribunal or any of its officials in any case or matter by any means other than open persuasion as an advocate
BC Lawyers BC Code r 5.1-2(d) partial 1 case
When acting as an advocate, a lawyer must not: ... (d) endeavour or allow anyone else to endeavour, directly or indirectly, to influence the decision or action of a tribunal or any of its officials in any case or matter by any means other than open persuasion as an advocate;
NZ Lawyers Conduct & Client Care Rules r 5.9 partial
A lawyer must not directly or indirectly offer to, or receive from, a third party any reward or inducement in respect of any advice given, referrals made, products or services purchased, or any work done for a client.
SCO Solicitors LSS Standards of Conduct no clear equivalent
SG Lawyers Professional Conduct Rules 2015 no clear equivalent
HK Solicitors Solicitors' Guide no clear equivalent
HK Barristers Bar Code of Conduct para 10.10 partial
A practising barrister must not give a commission or present or make any payment (other than a payment for practice promotion permitted by this Code) to any person for the purposes of procuring professional instructions or rewarding the giving or introduction of professional instructions.

Cases dealing with this duty

Clear

872 decisions · link basis: found breached = a tribunal finding; rule cited = the mapped provision is cited in the decision; text match = high-precision text pattern

  • Betty Igwebike Forde
    SDT solicitor 12583/2024 2024-11-27 rule cited

    Breaches, Client Money, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Failures, Money Laundering Regulations, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2019, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • (unnamed)
    SDT solicitor 12607/2024 2024-11-15 rule cited
    Variation of Conditions on Practising Certificate 1 PDF View decision
  • Richard Harbord
    SDT solicitor 12580/2024 2024-11-15 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Lack of Integrity, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2011, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2019, SRA Authorisation Rules, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Pr…

    Fine 1 PDF View decision
  • David Ebert LLP
    SDT solicitor 12590/2024 2024-11-05 rule cited

    Authorisation of Individuals Regulations 2019, Breaches, Code of Conduct for Firms 2019, SRA Principles 2019

    Fine 1 PDF View decision
  • David Durkin-Finch
    SDT solicitor 12586/2024 2024-11-01 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Lack of Integrity, Recklessness, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2019, SRA Principles 2019

    Prohibition Order, Suspend - Fixed Period 1 PDF View decision
  • Toslim Uddin Ahmed
    SDT solicitor 12570/2024 2024-11-01 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Mark Robert Westwood
    SDT solicitor 12610/2024 2024-11-01 rule cited

    Code of Conduct for Firms 2019, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Fine 1 PDF View decision
  • Jessica Kate Harris
    SDT solicitor 12562/2024 2024-11-01 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Firms 2019, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Matthew Waterfield
    SDT solicitor 12586/2024 2024-10-28 rule cited
    S.43 Order (clerks) 1 PDF View decision
  • Domenico Pisano
    SDT solicitor 12531/2023 2024-10-24 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Failures, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Lois Yvonne Bayliss
    SDT solicitor 12496/2023 2024-10-21 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, SRA Principles 2019

    Fine 1 PDF View decision
  • Ayub Bhailok; Robert Michael Fielding; Bhailok Fielding Solicitors
    SDT solicitor 12548/2024 2024-10-11 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, Code of Conduct for Firms 2019, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Failures, Money Laundering Regulations, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2011, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Princi…

    Fine 1 PDF View decision
  • Rajpal Panesar
    SDT solicitor 12552/2024 2024-10-11 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2019

    Suspend - Fixed Period 1 PDF View decision
  • Asiya Nasim Kaleem
    SDT solicitor 12545/2024 2024-10-11 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2019

    Fine 1 PDF View decision
  • David Storry Walton
    SDT solicitor 12633/2024 2024-10-02 rule cited

    Breaches, Criminal Convictions, SRA Principles 2011

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Takeshige Sugimoto
    SDT solicitor 12554/2024 2024-10-02 rule cited

    Breaches, SRA Overseas Principles

    S.43 Order (clerks) 1 PDF View decision
  • Simon Kennett Gurr
    SDT solicitor 12491/2023 2024-10-02 rule cited

    Code of Conduct 2011, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2011

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Geoffrey White
    SDT solicitor 12559/2024 2024-10-02 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, SRA Principles 2019

    Reprimand 1 PDF View decision
  • Philip Julian Paul Hyland
    SDT solicitor 12539/2024 2024-09-24 rule cited

    Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2019

    Fine 1 PDF View decision
  • Michael John Potter
    SDT solicitor 12584/2024 2024-09-19 rule cited

    Criminal Convictions, Failures, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Samantha Jayne Dyson
    SDT solicitor 12572/2024 2024-09-13 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, SRA Principles 2019

    Suspend - Fixed Period 1 PDF View decision
  • Martin Darren Rounthwaite
    SDT solicitor 12530/2023 2024-09-13 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Failures, Lack of Integrity, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2011, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Mohammed Tasnime Akunjee
    SDT solicitor 12542/2024 2024-09-13 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, SRA Principles 2019

    Fine 1 PDF View decision
  • Simon Paget-Brown
    SDT solicitor 12551/2024 2024-09-13 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Failures, Solicitors Accounts Rules 1998, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2019, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Suspend - Fixed Period 1 PDF View decision
  • Guy Nicholas Hurst
    SDT solicitor 12535/2024 2024-08-21 rule cited

    Breaches, Client Money, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, Misappropriation of Client Account, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2011, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2019, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision

Duty classification does not yet cover every jurisdiction (Ontario, New Zealand and Singapore decisions are indexed but not yet duty-classified), so counts here understate those corpora.