Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

K Pearce

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number11083/2012
Date01/01/2012
OutcomeS.43 Order (clerks)

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Failures, Others

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionSuspension
Suspension4 months
CostsGBP 26,000
Dishonesty foundNo

Before the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal, the First Respondent, a solicitor and supervising partner of James Pearce & Co, and the Second Respondent (his brother, an unadmitted conveyancing executive) faced allegations arising from 26 conveyancing transactions introduced by BW involving Option Agreements under which vendors paid large 'option release fees' (16-43% of sale price, totalling over £802,000) to BW who had paid only £25 total consideration. The firm failed to advise clients properly, acted in a conflict of interest, and ignored numerous mortgage-fraud warning signs. All remaining allegations were admitted and found proved; two Solicitors Accounts Rules allegations were withdrawn. The Tribunal expressly found no dishonesty and no fraud. The First Respondent was suspended for 4 months (implementation delayed to 7 May 2013) with post-suspension conditions barring partnership/sole practice and conveyancing, and ordered to pay £26,000 costs. The Second Respondent was made subject to a section 43 order and ordered to pay £14,000 costs (not enforceable without leave). Total agreed costs were £40,000.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Clients were vulnerable, appearing to be in urgent need of selling their properties
  • Numerous indicators of possible mortgage fraud were readily apparent and ignored
  • Large sums (over £802,000) passed to the introducer BW while First Respondent took no active interest in the work
  • Conflict of interest not recognised despite prior work for BW

Mitigating factors:

  • No allegation or finding of dishonesty, fraud or criminal conduct
  • No previous disciplinary matters
  • No client complaints and no shortfall in client money
  • Isolated conduct with no repetition; events some time ago
  • Cooperated with the regulator and made no attempt at concealment; admitted allegations

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/11083/