Skip to main content
discipline 4 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

James Alexander Gregg

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number7306/1996
Date01/01/1996
OutcomeS.43 Order (clerks)

Allegation / charges

Others

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionOther
CostsGBP 1,410
Dishonesty foundNo

James Alexander Gregg, a solicitor's clerk, wrote letters to a Canadian lawyer and London solicitors making misleading assertions about the bona fides and financial ability of B Limited (in fact a dormant company) in connection with a purported US$25m loan/prime bank guarantee scheme, an 'advance fee scam'. The applicant did not allege he was a co-conspirator but that his involvement lent credibility to the fraud without any verification. The Tribunal found the allegation substantiated and made a section 43 order preventing his employment by any solicitor without Law Society permission, and ordered him to pay costs of £1,409.73. No express finding of dishonesty was made.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Involvement lent credibility to a fraudulent 'advance fee'/'prime bank instrument' scheme
  • Gave reassurances on the flimsiest of circumstances without taking steps to verify authenticity or Mr N's authority to act

Mitigating factors:

  • Believed the client and transactions were genuine
  • Close to retirement age (nearly 63)
  • Suffering ill health and clinical depression
  • Cared for his wife for 20 months before her death
  • Unemployed, on income support, home repossessed, office closed

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/7306/