Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Mary Y P Fernando & Michael F Andrews

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number10182/2009
Date01/01/2009
OutcomeS.43 Order (clerks), Suspend - Indefinite

Allegation / charges

Client Money, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, Others

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionSuspension
CostsGBP 32,000
Dishonesty foundNo

Mrs Fernando, a sole practitioner conveyancing solicitor, admitted numerous breaches of the Solicitors Accounts Rules including a minimum client account shortage of £8,649.65, false/paper 'costs transfers' concealing overdrawn balances, secret profits from overcharging, and practising without a practising certificate. Her bookkeeper, Mr Andrews (a non-solicitor former chartered accountant), created false ledger entries with inaccurate dates in a 'spring cleaning exercise'. Dishonesty was expressly not alleged against either Respondent. The Tribunal suspended Mrs Fernando indefinitely and made a Section 43 Order against Mr Andrews (effective 19 March 2010). Costs fixed at £32,000, apportioned 75/25, with immediate payments of £7,500 and £2,500 respectively and the balance not enforceable without Tribunal consent.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Abdication of responsibility for proper maintenance of books and stewardship of client money
  • Minimum cash shortage of £8,649.65 on client account
  • Concealment of overdrawn client account balances through paper 'costs transfers'
  • Continued to operate client account and authorised withdrawals without a practising certificate

Mitigating factors:

  • No dishonesty alleged against either Respondent
  • Early admissions and full cooperation with FIO and SRA (Mrs Fernando)
  • Mrs Fernando's ill health and hospitalisation
  • Repayment of VAT incorrectly charged to clients
  • No known loss to clients or complaints
  • Positive written references and pro bono/voluntary work
  • Modest financial circumstances of both Respondents
  • Mr Andrews acted with best of intentions in difficult circumstances (no opening balances, backlog), acted largely on instructions

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/10182/