Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Iwan Meredydd Davies

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number11196/2013
Date01/01/2013
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Client Money, Failures, Others

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 25,000
Dishonesty foundYes

Iwan Meredydd Davies, a sole practitioner solicitor, faced eight accounts-related allegations arising from serious financial difficulties, all of which he admitted, plus an allegation of dishonesty in relation to three of them (retaining office money in client account, withdrawing from client account, and improperly operating suspense ledgers). He set up and operated suspense ledgers within his client account for about two years, allowing them to become overdrawn (up to £30,170.99) while making some £45,937.70 of office payments, including a £14,410 PII premium paid when the ledger was already overdrawn. The Tribunal applied the Twinsectra test and found, beyond reasonable doubt, that he acted dishonestly by ordinary standards and knew it. Despite exceptional character evidence, the Tribunal found no exceptional circumstances to depart from the normal sanction and struck him off the Roll, ordering costs of £25,000 not to be enforced without the Tribunal's permission given his means and IVA.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Dishonest conduct sustained over a period of about two years
  • Used client money for own benefit to prop up the firm
  • Suspense ledger overdrawn for substantial periods, used to make £45,937.70 of office payments in one year
  • Failed to check ledger and put own interests and firm's interests before clients'
  • No means of bringing the situation to an end

Mitigating factors:

  • No previous disciplinary findings
  • Full co-operation with the investigation; left a clear audit trail and was not evasive
  • Admitted all eight substantive allegations
  • Exemplary prior career and exceptional supportive testimonials and character witnesses
  • No client actually lost money
  • Personal and family difficulties and serious financial pressure at the relevant time

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/11196/