Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

APD Murray

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number10508/2010
Date01/01/2010
OutcomeSuspend - Indefinite

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, Others

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionSuspension
CostsGBP 18,000
Dishonesty foundNo

The Respondent, sole manager of a High Street firm, admitted 16 allegations of Solicitors' Accounts Rules breaches including reckless use of client funds, round sum transfers, personal transactions through client account and failure to reconcile accounts. The allegation of dishonesty was withdrawn with the Tribunal's consent following a late psychiatric report suggesting a possible mental health condition. The Tribunal found the Respondent had recklessly abandoned responsibility for the accounts but concluded, given the medical evidence and other circumstances, that striking off would be disproportionate. He was suspended indefinitely and ordered to pay £18,000 costs.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Sustained period of breaches
  • Same breaches identified again on second inspection in July 2010 after first FIR
  • Minimum cash shortage of approximately £91,955 identified
  • Round sum transfers with discrepancy of £116,397.86
  • Repeatedly blamed bookkeeper/accountants despite own non-delegable responsibility
  • Reckless, 'cavalier' abandonment of responsibility for accounts management

Mitigating factors:

  • Fully cooperative with the SRA and SIO (described as one of most cooperative individuals)
  • No previous disciplinary record
  • No client complaints and no money ultimately lost by clients (shortfalls made good by family funds)
  • Absolved his partner from responsibility
  • Medical evidence of mental health condition possibly causing functional impairment in 2008
  • Youth and inexperience, recession and property market slump, and difficulties with accountants
  • Spent significant sums attempting to rectify the accounts

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/10508/