Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Ian Graham Hutchinson

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number9054/2004
Date01/01/2004
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Failures, Others

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
Dishonesty foundYes

Ian Graham Hutchinson, a solicitor admitted in 1977, faced five allegations arising from his work for Chartavia, an aircraft-finance group. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal proceeded in his absence after finding his GP's report insufficient to justify an adjournment. He admitted the facts but denied dishonesty. The Tribunal found all allegations substantiated and, applying the Twinsectra test, expressly found the Respondent had been dishonest—writing misleading and inaccurate letters drafted by clients without regard to truth, giving false assurances about individuals (including a false three-year acquaintance with Mrs Redburn), and disbursing US$1 million in loan funds without proper authority and not for the stated purpose. Noting his prior 2001 disciplinary finding, the Tribunal struck him off the Roll and ordered him to pay costs including those of the Law Society's Investigation Accountant, to be assessed if not agreed.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Wrote letters drafted by clients with no regard to their truth, giving false assurances (e.g. concerning Mrs Redburn whom he claimed to have known for three years)
  • Provided the cloak of respectability enabling probable fraudsters
  • Disbursed US$1 million loan funds without proper authority and not for stated purpose
  • Previous disciplinary finding in December 2001 (fined £1,750) for supervision/client care failures

Mitigating factors:

  • Admitted the underlying facts (though denied dishonesty)
  • Cited personal and health reasons (chronic anxiety and depression) for non-attendance
  • Expressed with hindsight regret at his association with Chartavia

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/9054/