Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Amir Nazir Butt

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number12642/2024
Date12/02/2025
OutcomeFine

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Client Money, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Lack of Integrity, Misappropriation of Client Account, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2011, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionFine
FineGBP 35,000
CostsGBP 28,000
Dishonesty foundNo

Amir Nazir Butt, a sole practitioner trading as ANB Law, admitted three allegations: AML compliance failures (no FWRA, risk assessments, policies or training), a false/misleading declaration to the SRA in January 2020 about having a compliant FWRA, and failure to return client money promptly between 2014 and 2022. The Tribunal found all allegations proved and found a lack of integrity (not dishonesty). Conduct was assessed as very serious/high culpability with medium harm. The Tribunal imposed a fine of £35,000 (Level 4) plus three years of conditions (half-yearly accounts, yearly FWRA/AML/training submissions, and Lexcel accreditation by end 2025), and ordered costs of £28,000.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Experienced solicitor in a position of higher authority (President of regional Law Society branch) expected to set an example
  • Deficiencies indicated in unqualified accountants' reports from 2015 yet left unaddressed for years
  • Lack of integrity in misleading his regulator
  • Lack of insight into importance of returning client balances promptly

Mitigating factors:

  • Otherwise excellent 20-year record with no previous disciplinary matters
  • Full cooperation with the investigation and full admission of all allegations
  • Remedial action taken including AML training and written procedures
  • Issues affected less than 0.2% of files
  • No evidence of harm to clients from dishonesty, no financial benefit, no deficit on client account
  • Expressed remorse

Codes & rules applied

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/12642/