Decision record
Dorcas White
Allegation / charges
Reprimanded | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered July 29, 2006. View PDF DECISION of THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE of THE GENERAL LEGAL COUNCILCOMPLAINT No. 110/2005 BETWEEN C. DENNIS MORRISON Q.C. COMPLAINANT AND DORCAS WHITE RESPONDENT PANEL:Pamela Benka-Coker Q.C. Allan S. …
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
The complaint alleged that the Respondent, an attorney employed full-time as a lecturer at the Norman Manley Law School who nonetheless held annual practising certificates, failed to file accountant's reports or the required statutory declarations for 1999-2003 contrary to Regulation 16. The Panel rejected preliminary objections on jurisdiction, bias, and burden of proof, and held that a holder of a practising certificate in public employment must file for each preceding year either an accountant's report or a statutory declaration. The Respondent had not filed the declarations in time. No dishonesty was found. The Panel reprimanded the Respondent and ordered her to pay $20,000 costs to the General Legal Council.
Duties found breached:
Aggravating factors:
- As a full-time lecturer at the Norman Manley Law School she was expected to set an example of strict compliance with the law for her students
Mitigating factors:
- Respondent held a practising certificate but did not operate a full law practice and practised only on an ad hoc basis
- Any fees collected were paid after services were rendered, so no trust money was received
- Statutory declarations subsequently filed were unchallenged
- Failure attributed to pressure of work and not to disregard or contempt for the Regulations
Duties engaged
Documents
Source: https://www.generallegalcouncil.org/judgement/dorcas-white-complaint-no-110-of-2005/