Skip to main content
discipline 4 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

John F Fielding and Stanley M J Kerruish

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number8694/2002
Date01/01/2002
OutcomeStrike off, Suspend - Fixed Period

Allegation / charges

Client Money, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
Suspension24 months
CostsGBP 7,566
Dishonesty foundNo

Two partners of Fielding & Co. faced allegations of accounting breaches after an OSS investigation revealed a minimum client account shortage of £297,118.26 caused by Kerruish's systematic over-billing of clients. Kerruish accepted full responsibility for the over-billing; the Tribunal found all allegations against him substantiated and struck him off, ordering costs of £6,565.61. Fielding, who admitted the allegations on a strict-liability basis (no actual knowledge, suffering serious ill health), was suspended for two years and ordered to pay £1,000 costs. No express finding of dishonesty was recorded, though the conduct was described as 'looting' of client funds.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Widespread 'looting' of clients' funds causing minimum cash shortage of £297,118.26
  • Kerruish operated a deliberate system of over-billing clients
  • Clients unaware their funds were being improperly utilised
  • Kerruish's attempt to shift responsibility onto others via unsubstantiated allegations

Mitigating factors:

  • Fielding: no actual knowledge of the misconduct; strict liability as partner only
  • Fielding: prolonged and serious ill health at the relevant time
  • Fielding: reported the matter to the OSS and requested intervention to protect clients
  • Fielding: acted swiftly to set up new accounts and freeze partner's assets
  • Fielding: unblemished disciplinary record over 40 years; no intention of returning to practice

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/8694/