Skip to main content
discipline 4 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Lorraine Earle

JurisdictionJamaica
BodyGeneral Legal Council — Disciplinary Committee (GLC)
Professionattorney
Case number101 of 2003
DateApril 04, 2009
OutcomeStruck of f, Restitution Ordered

Allegation / charges

Struck of f, Restitution Ordered | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered April 04, 2009. View PDF DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE GENERAL LEGAL COUNCIL COMPLAINT NO. 101 OF 2003 IN THE MATTER OF A COMPLAINT BY GRACE PEART …

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsJMD 20,000
Dishonesty foundNo

Attorney Lorraine Earle was retained by complainant Grace Peart to incorporate a company, make two visa applications, and process title/probate work, receiving $212,500 plus handling a $50,000 cheque drawn on a closed account. She performed none of the work, failed to account, failed to return documents, and disappeared. The Committee found her guilty of professional misconduct in breach of Canons IV(r), IV(s), VII(b)(ii) and I(b). Although the Committee found she 'fraudulently encashed' a cheque, it did not expressly convict her under a dishonesty finding beyond the discredit-to-profession canon. She was ordered struck off the Roll, to make restitution of $262,500 plus interest, and pay $20,000 costs.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Received $212,500 and performed none of the retained work
  • Fraudulently encashed a $50,000 cheque drawn on a closed account and failed to reimburse
  • Failed to return client's valuable documents including titles and passports
  • Failed to respond to complaint or attend disciplinary proceedings
  • Previously struck off the Roll on 22 March 2006

Duties engaged

Other decisions involving this respondent

  • 87 of 2003 2006-05-13 · GLC · Jamaica · Fined, Already Struck off
  • 66 of 2000 2006-03-22 · GLC · Jamaica · Struck off, Restitution Ordered

Matched by respondent name — may include a different person with the same name.

Documents

Source: https://www.generallegalcouncil.org/judgement/lorraine-earle-complaint-no-101-of-2003/