Decision record
Umran Nasser-Puri
JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number10557/2010
Date01/01/2010
OutcomeProhibition Order
Allegation / charges
Breaches
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
SanctionOther
CostsGBP 1,104
Dishonesty foundYes
The Respondent, a former solicitor, was convicted at Snaresbrook Crown Court of obtaining a pecuniary advantage by deception, having dishonestly failed to disclose a prior conviction and previous enrolment on his QLTT application, which enabled his admission to the Roll. The Tribunal found the conviction arose from dishonesty and held it had jurisdiction. It refused an adjournment application. The Tribunal ordered that his name be prohibited from restoration to the Roll except by Order of the Tribunal, and ordered him to pay costs of £1,103.70, not to be enforced without leave of the Tribunal.
Duties found breached:
Aggravating factors:
- Dishonesty directly linked to securing admission to the Roll
- Conviction upheld on appeal; offence described as striking at the heart of the legal system, deceiving the Law Society and lay clients
Mitigating factors:
- No member of the public suffered loss and no client complaints
- Employer aware of the 1999 conviction
- Respondent had family and legal work was his only livelihood
- Matter had been hanging over the Respondent for a considerable period