Skip to main content
discipline 4 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Matthew Howells

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number12643/2024
Date14/03/2025
OutcomeSuspend - Fixed Period

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Criminal Convictions, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2019

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionSuspension
Suspension6 months
CostsGBP 2,096
Dishonesty foundNo

Solicitor Matthew Howells was convicted at Wimbledon Magistrates' Court on his guilty plea of stalking (without fear/alarm/distress) under s.2A(1) and (4) of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, arising from repeated unwanted contact and unsolicited gifts sent to Person A between March and June 2022 following a relationship breakdown. He was sentenced to a 12-month Community Order, victim surcharge £85, compensation £500, prosecution costs £144 and a 2-year Restraining Order. The SRA brought proceedings alleging breaches of Principles 2 and 5. He admitted the allegation. Dealt with on the papers by Agreed Outcome, the Tribunal found high culpability and approved a 6-month suspension plus costs of £2,096. No express finding of dishonesty was made; the case involved a lack of integrity but no dishonesty.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Misconduct was intentional with evidence of planning and prior intent (items bought in advance)
  • Continued over a period of time with repeated unwanted contact despite warnings to stop
  • Caused harm and distress to Person A (per SRA)
  • Convicted of a serious criminal offence; knew or ought to have known conduct breached obligations to protect public and reputation of profession
  • High culpability

Mitigating factors:

  • First-time offence with no previous disciplinary history and previously exemplary record
  • Early guilty plea and full cooperation with criminal and regulatory investigations
  • No dishonesty or financial gain
  • Mental health difficulties and high anxiety at the time
  • Engaged in therapy and rehabilitation
  • Significant personal and professional consequences already suffered (loss of home, job, reputation)
  • Isolated incident at low end of seriousness; court imposed lowest possible sanction

Codes & rules applied

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/12643/