The duty in context
No baseless or threatened misconduct report profession
The lawyer must not make or threaten a professional-misconduct allegation or report without a genuine, reasonably held and bona fide belief that it applies.
How the codes express this duty
E&W Solicitors SRA Principles & Code no clear equivalent
E&W Barristers BSB Handbook rC67 strong 50 cases
rC67 You must never make, or threaten to make, a report under Rule rC66 without a genuine and reasonably held belief that Rule rC66 applies.
BSB Handbook · current · archived copy · official source ↗
Cayman Islands Legal Services Code 2026 no clear equivalent
AU Solicitors Solicitors' Conduct Rules Rule 32.1 strong 196 cases
A solicitor must not make an allegation against another Australian legal practitioner of unsatisfactory professional conduct or professional misconduct unless the allegation is made bona fide and the solicitor believes on reasonable grounds that available material by which the allegation could be supported provides a proper basis for it.
Australian Solicitors' Conduct Rules · 2015 (June 2026 compilation) · archived copy · official source ↗
AU Barristers Uniform Barristers Rules no clear equivalent
IE Solicitors Law Society Guide no clear equivalent
IE Barristers Bar Code of Conduct no clear equivalent
JM Attorneys Canons of Professional Ethics no clear equivalent
JE Lawyers Law Society of Jersey Code no clear equivalent
ON Lawyers LSO Rules of Prof. Conduct r 3.2-5(b); r 7.1-3 commentary [1] partial
3.2-5 A lawyer shall not, in an attempt to gain a benefit for a client, threaten, or advise a client to threaten, without reasonable and lawful justification ... (b) to make a complaint to a regulatory authority. [7.1-3 commentary [1]: In all cases, the report must be made without malice or ulterior motive. 3.2-5 commentary [1]: It is an abuse of the process of a court or, ordinarily, a regulatory authority to threaten to make or advance a charge or complaint in order to secure the satisfaction of a private grievance.]
Law Society of Ontario — Rules of Professional Conduct · current · archived copy · official source ↗
BC Lawyers BC Code r 7.1-3, commentary [2] partial 41 cases
Nothing in this paragraph is meant to interfere with the lawyer-client relationship. In all cases, the report must be made without malice or ulterior motive.
Code of Professional Conduct for British Columbia (BC Code) · 2017 · archived copy · official source ↗
NZ Lawyers Conduct & Client Care Rules r 2.10 strong
A lawyer must not use, or threaten to use, the complaints or disciplinary process for an improper purpose.
Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 · SR 2008/214 · archived copy · official source ↗
SCO Solicitors LSS Standards of Conduct no clear equivalent
SG Lawyers Professional Conduct Rules 2015 r 29 (Allegations against another legal practitioner) partial 11 cases
29 Allegations against another legal practitioner
Legal Profession (Professional Conduct) Rules 2015 · 2015 · archived copy · official source ↗
HK Solicitors Solicitors' Guide no clear equivalent
HK Barristers Bar Code of Conduct para 10.50 partial
A practising barrister shall not make any allegation of misconduct or dishonesty against another barrister unless such allegation is supported by reasonably credible evidence.
Code of Conduct of the Bar of the Hong Kong SAR · 2018 · archived copy · official source ↗
Cases dealing with this duty
522 decisions · link basis: found breached = a tribunal finding; rule cited = the mapped provision is cited in the decision; text match = high-precision text pattern
-
Matthew Conway Ledvina
Appeals, Failures
-
Wendy Michelle Randall
Breaches
-
-
PATRICK JAMES MUGLISTON
Struck Off the Roll of Practitioners
-
RICHARD JAMES LAWSON
Struck Off the Roll of Practitioners
-
KELVIN KA CHUEN TANG
Struck Off the Roll of Practitioners
-
-
-
David Yu-Hsiang Chen
Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement
-
W. Anthony Pearson
Fined | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered April 20, 2022. || Guilty of Misconduct in a Professional Respect | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered February 28, 2022 || Formal Order (PDF) View PDF in Full Sc…
-
Sean O’Neil Kinghorn
Fined | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered April 13, 2022. || Guilty of Professional Misconduct | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered November 16, 2021 || Formal Order delivered April 19, 2022 (PDF) View PD…
-
Duncan Peter Burtwell
Breaches
-
-
Elizabeth Catherine Nedin
Client Money, Failures
-
-
Anthony Alexander Armstrong
Reprimanded, Fined | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered February 02, 2022. || Guilty of Professional Misconduct | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered January 28, 2022. View PDF DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY …
-
Anthony Alexander Armstrong
Guilty of Professional Misconduct | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered January 28, 2022. || Reprimanded, Fined | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered February 02, 2022. View PDF DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY …
-
Rosario Cateno Di Bella
Rule 4-29 Admission of Misconduct and Undertaking to the Discipline Committee
-
Dexter Charles Anthony Wadsworth
Struck off | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered January 18, 2022. || Guilty of Professional Misconduct | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered November 24, 2021. View PDF FORMAL ORDER OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMM…
-
-
Katrina Sriranpong
Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement | Summary
-
de Robillard, Christian Roger
Ground 1: Fundamental breaches of the Legal Profession Uniform Conduct (Barristers) Rules 2015, in summary: 1. invoking the coercive powers of the Supreme Court against an officer of the Court (solicitor) resulting in t…
Order recommending removal of lawyer's name from the Roll of Australian Lawyers $0.00 Proceedings Instituted 2 PDFs View decision -
-
Amarjit Singh Dhindsa
Rule 4-29 Admission of Misconduct and Undertaking to the Discipline Committee
-
Cameron James McKenzie
The respondent engaged in professional misconduct.
Duty classification does not yet cover every jurisdiction (Ontario, New Zealand and Singapore decisions are indexed but not yet duty-classified), so counts here understate those corpora.