Decision record
Stephanie Berry
Allegation / charges
Breaches, Client Money, Solicitors' Accounts Rules
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
Stephanie Berry, a solicitor at the former firm Garstangs Solicitors, faced four allegations of misusing/misappropriating client funds, misappropriating client cash, writing misleading communications to a client, and misleading solicitors, all alleged to involve dishonesty. She did not attend and the hearing proceeded in her absence. The Tribunal found Allegation 1.1 proved (breaches of accounts rules), but found dishonesty only in relation to client R's estate - where she transferred £1,646.43 of estate monies to pay other clients including a £1,050 fictitious 'boiler replacement'/damages payment to Ms NO and created duplicate misleading estate accounts. Allegation 1.3 was found proved with dishonesty - she maintained a fiction over emails and a letter that court proceedings had been issued and successfully concluded for client NO when none existed. Allegations 1.2 (misappropriating cash) and 1.4 (misleading solicitors re Land Registry/HMRC) were found not proved. The Tribunal ordered her struck off the Roll and to pay costs of £15,200 (reduced from over £22,000), not to be enforced without leave of the Tribunal.
Duties found breached:
- Proper basis for allegations
- Act in the client's best interests
- No conflict between current clients
- No improper use of client money
Aggravating factors:
- Dishonesty proved against the Respondent
- Misconduct continued over a period of time
- Some actions were planned rather than spontaneous (e.g. misleading client NO about non-existent litigation)
- Breach of a position of trust involving deceased persons' estate monies
- Concealment of wrongdoing before leaving the firm
- Relatively experienced solicitor with direct control and responsibility as fee earner
Mitigating factors:
- Respondent was unwell at the material time (depression/auto-immune disease)
- Made some admissions
- Personal circumstances may have been more difficult due to ill health
- No previous disciplinary matters
Duties engaged
- Proper basis for allegations
- Honesty
- Integrity
- No bribery or improper gifts
- Personal probity and fitness to practise
- Uphold public trust in the profession
- No unlawful discrimination or harassment
- Act in the client's best interests
- No conflict between current clients
- No improper use of client money
- Accounting records, reconciliation and reports