Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Richard Charles Boyd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number12338/2022
Date07/11/2022
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Failures

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
Dishonesty foundYes

Richard Charles Boyd, a partner (later sole practitioner) at North Yorkshire Law, was found to have improperly transferred up to £37,677.60 from client account to office account across seven probate matters on 27 February 2020 to address the firm's financial difficulties, without notifying clients or providing bills. He falsely told an executor client that taking costs before discussion was 'perfectly normal'. After his partnership dissolved and the firm lost SRA authorisation, he failed to disclose to his PII insurers that the SRA had told him he was not authorised, and made three untruthful/misleading statements to insurers about his authorisation status. The Tribunal made express findings of dishonesty on Principle 4 for all four proved allegations. A recklessness allegation was dismissed. Given the high culpability and serious dishonesty, and finding no exceptional circumstances, the Tribunal struck him off the Roll. Costs were assessed at £32,500 but no order as to costs was made due to his very limited means (recently discharged bankrupt, reliant on pension).

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Deliberate, calculated and repeated misconduct
  • Misleading of insurers continued over many months
  • Targeting of vulnerable probate estate funds
  • Concealment from estate representatives and insurers
  • Aware he was in material breach in all aspects
  • Browbeating client Mrs Mainprize into agreeing to an already-made transfer on a false pretext

Mitigating factors:

  • Monies eventually returned to client account (no client lost money)
  • Cooperated with the SRA investigation
  • Made some admissions (admitted Accounts Rules breaches)
  • Unblemished regulatory history over long career
  • Glowing character references

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/12338/