Skip to main content
discipline 1 October 2026

The duty in context

Competence practice

The lawyer must provide a competent standard of work and service and must decline or not accept instructions for work beyond their competence, authorisation or available resources.

245 cases 36% strike-off avg suspension 27.2 mo avg fine 11,786 34 with dishonesty finding

How the codes express this duty

E&W Solicitors SRA Principles & Code CCS 3.2 strong 79 cases
3.2 You ensure that the service you provide to clients is competent and delivered in a timely manner.
E&W Barristers BSB Handbook CD7; rC21.7; rC21.8 strong 12 cases
CD7 You must provide a competent standard of work and service to each client. rC21 You must not accept instructions ... if: ... .7 you are not authorised and/or otherwise accredited to perform the work required ...; or .8 you are not competent to handle the particular matter or otherwise do not have enough experience to handle the matter;
Cayman Islands Legal Services Code 2026 P.6; R.4.1(c)(ii) strong
Attorneys-at-law shall provide a proper standard of work and service to their clients... shall not act... if the attorney-at-law, or a recognised law entity, does not have sufficient resources or competence to deal properly with the matter
AU Solicitors Solicitors' Conduct Rules Rule 4.1.3 strong 49 cases
A solicitor must also:... 4.1.3 deliver legal services competently, diligently and as promptly as reasonably possible.
AU Barristers Uniform Barristers Rules rr21(a),5(c) partial 12 cases
A barrister must accept a brief from a solicitor to appear before a court in a field in which the barrister practises or professes to practise if: (a) the brief is within the barrister's capacity, skill and experience ... barristers ... must act honestly, fairly, skilfully and with competence and diligence.
IE Solicitors Law Society Guide Ch2 — Refusal of instructions; Proper standard of legal services: General strong
A solicitor should not accept instructions to act in a matter for which they do not have sufficient expertise, time, or adequate resources to give the necessary attention to the matter... The standard of care expected of a solicitor is that of a reasonably careful and skilful solicitor who has the relevant expertise.
IE Barristers Bar Code of Conduct Rule 2.3(f); Rule 3.21 strong
Where Barristers receive instructions which they believe to be beyond their competence they should decline to act in the matter and shall so inform the instructing solicitor without delay.
JM Attorneys Canons of Professional Ethics Canon IV; Canon IV(s) strong 77 cases
AN ATTORNEY SHALL ACT IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF HIS CLIENT AND REPRESENT HIM HONESTLY, COMPETENTLY AND ZEALOUSLY WITHIN THE BOUNDS OF THE LAW. ... [IV(s)] In the performance of his duties an Attorney shall not act with inexcusable or deplorable negligence or neglect.
JE Lawyers Law Society of Jersey Code P.6; R.1.1 c)ii) strong
Members must provide a proper standard of work and service to their clients... A member... must not act... ii) if the member, his or her employee or his or her firm do not have sufficient resources or competence to deal properly with the matter.
ON Lawyers LSO Rules of Prof. Conduct r 3.1-2; r 3.1-2 commentary [6] strong
3.1-2 A lawyer shall perform any legal services undertaken on a client's behalf to the standard of a competent lawyer. [Commentary [6]: A lawyer must recognize a task for which the lawyer lacks competence ... If consulted about such a task, the lawyer should (a) decline to act; (b) obtain the client's instructions to retain, consult, or collaborate with a licensee who is competent for that task; or (c) obtain the client's consent for the lawyer to become competent without undue delay, risk or expense to the client.]
BC Lawyers BC Code r 3.1-2 strong 5 cases
A lawyer must perform all legal services undertaken on a client's behalf to the standard of a competent lawyer.
NZ Lawyers Conduct & Client Care Rules r 3 strong
In providing regulated services to a client, a lawyer must always act competently and in a timely manner consistent with the terms of the retainer and the duty to take reasonable care.
SCO Solicitors LSS Standards of Conduct B1.10 strong 9 cases
You must only act in those matters where you are competent to do so.
SG Lawyers Professional Conduct Rules 2015 r 5 (Honesty, competence and diligence) strong 9 cases
5 Honesty, competence and diligence
HK Solicitors Solicitors' Guide Principle 6.01 / Principle 5.03 strong
A solicitor owes his client a duty to be competent to perform any legal services undertaken on the client's behalf. ... A solicitor must not act or continue to act in circumstances where he cannot represent the client with competence or diligence.
HK Barristers Bar Code of Conduct para 10.5(a) strong
He should not undertake any tasks which:- (a) he knows or ought to know he is not competent or sufficiently experienced to handle;

Cases dealing with this duty

Clear

245 decisions · link basis: found breached = a tribunal finding; rule cited = the mapped provision is cited in the decision; text match = high-precision text pattern

  • Kengai Ponnampalam Chetty
    SDT solicitor 10761/2011 2011-01-01 text match

    Breaches, Criminal Convictions

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Howard A. Lettman
    GLC attorney 45 of 2008 2010-09-28 rule cited

    unavailable | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered September 28, 2010. View PDF DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE GENERAL LEGAL COUNCIL Complaint #45/2008 IN THE MATTER of the Complaint by SHEILA BALFOU…

    unavailable 1 PDF View decision
  • Antonnette Haughton Cardenas
    GLC attorney 131 of 2007 2010-05-22 rule cited

    Fined | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered May 22, 2010. View PDF DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEEOF THE GENERAL LEGAL COUNCILCOMPLAINT NO. 131/2007 IN THE MATTER of CLIFTON WILLIAMS VS ANTONNETTE HAUGHTON-…

    Fined 1 PDF View decision
  • Carlton H. Campbell
    GLC attorney 234 of 2002 2010-03-28 rule cited

    Compensation | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered March 28, 2010. View PDF IN THE MATTER of MILLICENT FORREST v CARLTON CAMPBELL, an Attorney-at-Law AND IN THE MATTER of the Legal Profession Act. Complaint No. 23…

    Compensation 1 PDF View decision
  • Audley Earl Melhado
    GLC attorney 168 of 2007 2010-01-23 rule cited

    Restitution Ordered, Fined | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered January 23, 2010. View PDF DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEEOF THE GENERAL LEGAL COUNCILComplaint No. 168/2007 IN THE MATTER of a complaint by …

    Restitution Ordered, Fined 1 PDF View decision
  • Joanne Karen Waller
    SDT solicitor 10616/2010 2010-01-01 text match

    Others

    S.43 Order (clerks) 1 PDF View decision
  • Sean O’Neil Kinghorn
    GLC attorney 117 of 2007 2009-09-26 rule cited

    Dismissed, Costs | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered September 26, 2009. View PDF DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE GENERAL LEGAL COUNCILCOMPLAINT No. 117 of 2007 BETWEEN EARL BIGGS COMPLAINANT AND S…

    Dismissed, Costs 1 PDF View decision
  • Antonnette Haughton Cardenas
    GLC attorney 41 of 2007 2009-07-31 rule cited

    Struck off, Repayment Ordered | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered July 31, 2009. View PDF DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE GENERAL LEGAL COUNCIL COMPLAINT 41/2007 BETWEEN AVIS SMITH COMPLAINANT AND …

    Struck off, Repayment Ordered 1 PDF View decision
  • Charles Anthony Sinclair Jnr.
    GLC attorney 14 of 2008 2009-05-09 rule cited

    Restitution Ordered, Fined | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered May 09, 2009. View PDF Decision of the Disciplinary Committee of the General Legal Council Complaint No. 14/2008 IN THE MATTER of a Complaint by Alb…

    Restitution Ordered, Fined 1 PDF View decision
  • Lorraine Earle
    GLC attorney 101 of 2003 2009-04-04 rule cited

    Struck of f, Restitution Ordered | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered April 04, 2009. View PDF DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE GENERAL LEGAL COUNCIL COMPLAINT NO. 101 OF 2003 IN THE MATTER OF A COMP…

    Struck of f, Restitution Ordered 1 PDF View decision
  • R. A.(Bill) Salmon
    GLC attorney 235 of 2005 2009-02-28 rule cited

    Fined | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered February 28, 2009. View PDF DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE GENERAL LEGAL COUNCILComplaint No. 235/2005 IN THE MATTER of the Disciplinary Committee of the …

    Fined 1 PDF View decision
  • John Warner Smith & Alick Arlington Voliere
    SDT solicitor 10273/2009 2009-01-01 found breached

    Breaches, Failures

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Kirit Chhagan Pankhania
    SDT solicitor 10387/2009 2009-01-01 found breached

    Breaches, Failures

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Stephen Richard Outram
    SDT solicitor 10325/2009 2009-01-01 found breached

    Breaches, Failures, Others

    Suspend - Indefinite 1 PDF View decision
  • Catherine KINCAID
    LSC-QLD solicitor Michael Sing Lawyers 2008-12-19 found breached text match

    Guilty of professional misconduct on 1 charge.

    other 1 PDF View decision
  • Michael A. Williams
    GLC attorney 242 of 2005 2008-12-13 rule cited

    Restitution Ordered, Fined | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered December 13, 2008. View PDF DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE GENERAL LEGAL COUNCIL COMPLAINT No. 242 OF 2005 IN THE MATTER OF A COMPLAI…

    Restitution Ordered, Fined 1 PDF View decision
  • Howard A. Lettman
    GLC attorney 254 of 2005 2008-12-13 rule cited

    Fined | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered December 13, 2008. View PDF DECISION of THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE of THE GENERAL LEGAL COUNCILCOMPLAINT NO. 254/2005 In the Matter of FREDERICK CHAMBERS and HOWARD LETT…

    Fined 1 PDF View decision
  • Douglas John WINNING
    LSC-QLD solicitor Winning & Sorenson 2008-10-13 text match

    Guilty of professional misconduct on 1 charge.

    other 2 PDFs View decision
  • Beriston Bryan
    GLC attorney 131 of 2003 2008-10-04 found breached

    Fined, Restitution Ordered | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered October 04, 2008. View PDF DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE GENERAL LEGAL COUNCIL COMPLAINT No. 131 OF 2003 IN THE MATTER OF A COMPLAIN…

    Fined, Restitution Ordered 1 PDF View decision
  • James Xavier MADDEN
    LSC-QLD solicitor Madden & Co 2008-09-30 found breached

    Guilty of unsatisfactory professional conduct on 1 charge. Guilty of professional misconduct on 5 charges.

    other 1 PDF View decision
  • Anthony M. Gifford Q.C.
    GLC attorney 59 of 2005 2008-06-25 rule cited

    Fined | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered June 25, 2008. View PDF DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE GENERAL LEGAL COUNCILCOMPLAINT No. 59/2005 BETWEEN JOHN GREWCOCK COMPLAINANT AND LORD ANTHONY GIFFO…

    Fined 1 PDF View decision
  • Beriston Bryan
    GLC attorney 44 of 2006 2008-05-17 rule cited

    Fined | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered May 17, 2008. View PDF DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE GENERAL LEGAL COUNCIL COMPLAINT No. 44/2006 IN THE MATTER of the complaint by Carl Leadbeater agains…

    Fined 1 PDF View decision
  • Antonnette Haughton Cardenas
    GLC attorney 167 of 2003 2008-04-01 rule cited

    Deferred (Decision Pending Attorney Response) | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered April 01, 2008. View PDF DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE GENERAL LEGAL COUNCIL COMPLAINT No. 167/2003 IN THE MATTER…

    Deferred (Decision Pending Attorney Response) 1 PDF View decision
  • Beriston Bryan
    GLC attorney 36 of 2004 2008-03-08 rule cited

    Restitution Ordered | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered March 08, 2008. View PDF DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE GENERAL LEGAL COUNCIL COMPLAINT No. 36/2004 IN THE MATTER of the complaint by ERROL …

    Restitution Ordered 1 PDF View decision
  • J W Smith, M Rahman & Others
    SDT solicitor 10049/2008 2008-01-01 found breached

    Breaches, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

    Fine, S.43 Order (clerks), Strike off, Suspend - Fixed Period 1 PDF View decision

Duty classification does not yet cover every jurisdiction (Ontario, New Zealand and Singapore decisions are indexed but not yet duty-classified), so counts here understate those corpora.