Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

J J Patel

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number10347/2009
Date01/01/2009
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Others

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 1,500
Dishonesty foundNo

Nyla Qureshi, admitted 2007, accepted a police Caution on 7 June 2010 for two offences of dishonesty (obtaining refunds at TK Maxx using original goods labels). The SRA did not allege dishonesty; the sole allegation was that by agreeing to accept the Caution she breached Rule 1.06 SCC. She admitted the allegation, maintaining she had not committed the offences but accepted the Caution to end matters swiftly under family/cultural pressure and following incorrect legal advice. The Tribunal, applying Bolton v The Law Society, found the breach substantiated beyond reasonable doubt and, despite no dishonesty finding and substantial mitigation, concluded that admitting offences she claimed not to have committed went to the heart of her integrity and professionalism. It ordered her struck off the Roll immediately and to pay agreed costs of £1,500.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Actions were not done on the spur of the moment - she had ample time (23 April to 7 June 2010) to take legal advice and research consequences
  • Admitted offences she maintained she had not committed, solely to obtain a Caution to keep matters hidden
  • Was aware there could be professional consequences before accepting the Caution
  • Prime motivation appeared to be keeping events hidden by any means

Mitigating factors:

  • Previous good character with no prior disciplinary matters
  • Full cooperation with the SRA investigation
  • Genuine contrition and apology
  • Conduct occurred outside her professional practice
  • Acted under significant personal stress, fear and family/cultural honour pressures after 19 hours in police cells
  • Received incorrect legal advice about consequences of accepting a Caution
  • Positive character references and community involvement
  • No allegation of dishonesty made against her

⚠ figures not found verbatim in the source were dropped: ["review_dishonesty_finding_cue_present"]

Duties engaged

Other decisions involving this respondent

  • 10347/2009 2009-01-01 · SDT · England & Wales · Strike off

Matched by respondent name — may include a different person with the same name.

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/10347/