Skip to main content
discipline 1 October 2026

The duty in context

No conflict between current clients client

The lawyer must not act for two or more current clients with conflicting interests except within defined exceptions with each client's informed consent and protection of confidentiality.

1,282 cases 61% strike-off avg suspension 17.6 mo avg fine 138,302 623 with dishonesty finding

How the codes express this duty

E&W Solicitors SRA Principles & Code CCS 6.2 strong 841 cases
6.2 You do not act in relation to a matter or particular aspect of it if you have a conflict of interest or a significant risk of such a conflict in relation to that matter or aspect of it, unless: (a) the clients have a substantially common interest ...; or the clients are competing for the same objective, and the conditions below are met ...
E&W Barristers BSB Handbook rC21.3; gC69 strong 29 cases
rC21.3 there is a conflict of interest, or real risk of conflict of interest, between the prospective client and one or more of your former or existing clients in respect of the particular matter unless all of the clients who have an interest in the particular matter give their informed consent to your acting in such circumstances;
Cayman Islands Legal Services Code 2026 R.7.1; R.7.2; R.7.3 strong
Except in the limited circumstances dealt with in R.7.3, an attorney-at-law or a recognised law entity shall not act if there is a conflict of interests or a significant risk of a conflict... may act, in non-contentious matters, for more than one client whose interests conflict in the matter only with the informed written consent of all clients.
AU Solicitors Solicitors' Conduct Rules Rules 11.1; 11.2; 11.3; 11.4 strong 126 cases
11.1 A solicitor and a law practice must avoid conflicts between the duties owed to two or more current clients. 11.2 If a solicitor or a law practice seeks to act for two or more clients in the same or related matters where the clients' interests are adverse and there is a conflict or potential conflict... the solicitor or law practice must not act, except where permitted by Rules 11.3 and 11.4.
AU Barristers Uniform Barristers Rules r113 strong 38 cases
A barrister who is briefed to appear for two or more parties in any case must determine as soon as possible whether the interests of the clients may, as a real possibility, conflict and, if so, the barrister must then return the brief for: (a) all the clients in the case of confidentiality to which Rule 108 would apply; or (b) one or more of the clients so as to remove that possibility of conflict.
IE Solicitors Law Society Guide Ch3 — General; Conflict of interest between two clients; Non-conveyancing transactions strong 50 cases
A solicitor should not act in a matter, or any part of a matter, where there is a conflict of interest... If a solicitor, acting with ordinary care, would give different advice to different clients about the same matter, there is a conflict of interest, and the solicitor should not act for both clients... Where clients consent to one firm representing both parties to a non-conveyancing transaction, the law requires that each client gives informed consent.
IE Barristers Bar Code of Conduct Rule 3.16; Rule 10.10 partial 50 cases
In cases involving several parties, Barristers on receipt of instructions for more than one of such parties should consider whether or not any conflict arises as between the individual interests of each of the clients and they shall advise the solicitor as to whether any of the clients should be separately advised and represented by a Barrister or solicitor. ... Barristers may appear for more than one defendant in a criminal trial provided they have satisfied themselves that there is no conflict of interest.
JM Attorneys Canons of Professional Ethics Canon IV(k); Canon IV(l); Canon IV(m) strong 125 cases
Subject to the provisions of Canon IV (l), an Attorney shall not accept or continue his retainer or employment on behalf of two or more clients if their interests are likely to conflict or if the independent professional judgment of the Attorney is likely to be impaired. (l) Notwithstanding the provisions of Canon IV (k), an Attorney may represent multiple clients if he can adequately represent the interests of each and if each consent to such representation after full disclosure of the possible effects of such multiple representation.
JE Lawyers Law Society of Jersey Code R.6.1; R.6.3 strong
Except in the limited circumstances dealt with in R.6.3, a member or their firm must not act if there is a conflict of interests or a significant risk of a conflict... A member or their firm may act, in non-contentious matters, for more than one client whose interests conflict in the matter only with the informed written consent of all clients.
ON Lawyers LSO Rules of Prof. Conduct r 3.4-2; r 3.4-3 strong
3.4-2 A lawyer shall not represent a client in a matter when there is a conflict of interest unless there is consent, which must be fully informed and voluntary after disclosure, from all affected clients and the lawyer reasonably believes that he or she is able to represent each client without having a material adverse effect upon the representation of or loyalty to the other client. [3.4-3 Despite rule 3.4-2, a lawyer shall not represent opposing parties in a dispute.]
BC Lawyers BC Code r 3.4-2 strong 35 cases
A lawyer must not represent a client in a matter when there is a conflict of interest unless there is express or implied consent from all clients and the lawyer reasonably believes that he or she is able to represent each client without having a material adverse effect upon the representation of or loyalty to the other client.
NZ Lawyers Conduct & Client Care Rules r 6.1 strong
A lawyer must not act for more than 1 client on a matter in any circumstances where there is a more than negligible risk that the lawyer may be unable to discharge the obligations owed to 1 or more of the clients.
SCO Solicitors LSS Standards of Conduct B1.7 strong 55 cases
You must not act for two or more clients in matters where there is a conflict of interest between the clients or for any client where there is a conflict between the interest of the client and your interest or that of your practice unit.
SG Lawyers Professional Conduct Rules 2015 r 20 (Conflict, or potential conflict, between interests of 2 or more clients) strong 8 cases
20 Conflict, or potential conflict, between interests of 2 or more clients
HK Solicitors Solicitors' Guide Principle 9.01 strong
A solicitor or firm of solicitors must not accept instructions to act for two or more clients where there is a conflict or a significant risk of conflict between the interests of those clients.
HK Barristers Bar Code of Conduct para 10.14(a) strong
If after he has accepted the brief or instructions on behalf of more than one lay client, there is or appears to be a conflict or a risk of conflict between the interests of any one or more of such clients, he must not continue to act for any client unless all such clients give their consent to his so acting and he can do so without embarrassment.

Cases dealing with this duty

Clear

1,282 decisions · link basis: found breached = a tribunal finding; rule cited = the mapped provision is cited in the decision; text match = high-precision text pattern

  • Joseph Traynor
    LSI solicitor Traynor & Company, Solicitors, 86 Clanbrassil Street, Dundalk, Co Louth 2010-07-05 found breached

    In the matter of Joseph Traynor, solicitor, formerly practising as Traynor & Company, Solicitors, 86 Clanbrassil Street, Dundalk, Co Louth, and in the matter of the Solicitors Acts 1954-2008 [5554/DT01/10 and High Court…

    strike_off View decision
  • Graeme Stark Herald
    SSDT solicitor Graeme Stark Herald formerly of Herald & Company, 85 High Street, Arbroath, and now of 27/10 Hawthornbank Lane, Edinburgh 2010-06-25 found breached
    strike_off No Appeal 1 PDF View decision
  • Michael J Murphy
    LSI solicitor MJ Murphy & Co, Solicitors, 25 Lower Salthill, Galway, Co Galway 2010-06-14 found breached

    In the matter of Michael J Murphy, a solicitor formerly practising as MJ Murphy & Co, Solicitors, 25 Lower Salthill, Galway, Co Galway, and in the matter of the Solicitors Acts 1954-2008 [4803/DT119/08 and High Court re…

    strike_off View decision
  • O'donnell, John Alexander
    OLSC solicitor (Formerly) John A O'Donnell & Associates [2010] NSWADT 130 2010-05-31 found breached

    1. Wilfully breached Sections 255 and 264 of Legal Profession Act 2004 - relating to trust funds 2. Wilfully breached Section 264 of the Legal Profession Act 2004 - handling of trust moneys 3. Misappropriated funds 4. F…

    Costs Removal of practitioner's name from the Roll of Local Lawyers $0.00 Proceedings Instituted 1 PDF View decision
  • PAUL ERNEST MASTEN
    LPBWA lawyer Suite 2 and Suite 11 16 Philimore Street FREMANTLE WA 6166 Legal Profession Complaints Committee v Masten [2010] WASAT 47 and [2010] WASAT 47 (S) 2010-04-08 found breached

    Professional Misconduct

    Professional Misconduct 2 PDFs View decision
  • DAMIEN GERARD BRENNAN
    LPBWA lawyer 89 Duchess Street BUSSELTON WA 6280 Legal Profession Complaints Committee v Brennan [2010] WASAT 46 2010-04-07 found breached

    Professional Misconduct

    Professional Misconduct 1 PDF View decision
  • Carlton H. Campbell
    GLC attorney 234 of 2002 2010-03-28 found breached

    Compensation | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered March 28, 2010. View PDF IN THE MATTER of MILLICENT FORREST v CARLTON CAMPBELL, an Attorney-at-Law AND IN THE MATTER of the Legal Profession Act. Complaint No. 23…

    Compensation 1 PDF View decision
  • Trevor Ruddock
    GLC attorney 74 of 2003 2010-02-13 found breached

    Struck off, Repayment & Restitution Ordered | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered February 13, 2010. View PDF JUDGEMENT OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE COMPLAINT NO. 74 OF 2003 BETWEEN JOAN BURKETT POWELL COMPLAINAN…

    Struck off, Repayment & Restitution Ordered 1 PDF View decision
  • Audley Earl Melhado
    GLC attorney 168 of 2007 2010-01-23 found breached

    Restitution Ordered, Fined | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered January 23, 2010. View PDF DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEEOF THE GENERAL LEGAL COUNCILComplaint No. 168/2007 IN THE MATTER of a complaint by …

    Restitution Ordered, Fined 1 PDF View decision
  • Mary Miley
    LSI solicitor Mary Miley & Co, Solicitors, at Brewery Place, Rathdrum, Co Wicklow 2010-01-18 found breached

    In the matter of Mary Miley, solicitor, formerly practising as Mary Miley & Co, Solicitors, at Brewery Place, Rathdrum, Co Wicklow, and in the matter of the Solicitors Acts 1954-2008 [3916/DT90/08 and High Court record …

    strike_off View decision
  • Mary Miley
    LSI solicitor Mary Miley & Co, Solicitors, Brewery Place, Rathdrum, Co Wicklow 2010-01-18 found breached

    In the matter of Mary Miley, solicitor, formerly practising as Mary Miley & Co, Solicitors, at Brewery Place, Rathdrum, Co Wicklow, and in the matter of the Solicitors Acts 1954-2008 [3916/DT39/09 and High Court record …

    strike_off View decision
  • Richard Adamson - J
    SDT solicitor 10683/2010 2010-01-01 found breached

    Client Money, Criminal Convictions

    S.43 Order (clerks) 1 PDF View decision
  • S V Koranteng
    SDT solicitor 10484/2010 2010-01-01 found breached

    Breaches, Failures, Others

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Alexander David Winterton & Michael Miller
    SDT solicitor 10481/2010 2010-01-01 found breached text match

    Breaches, Failures, Others

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Asabe Georgina Adeyemo
    SDT solicitor 10580/2010 2010-01-01 found breached

    Failures

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Peter James Scott
    SDT solicitor 10551/2010 2010-01-01 found breached

    Breaches, Client Money, Failures, Others, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Anil Bance & Davinder Singh Cheema
    SDT solicitor 10492/2010 2010-01-01 found breached

    Breaches, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, Others

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Zahid Aziz Sheikh & Another
    SDT solicitor 10556/2010 2010-01-01 found breached

    Breaches, Client Money, Failures, Others

    Fine, Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Stuart Gemmell McPhail & Another
    SDT solicitor 10624/2010 2010-01-01 found breached

    Breaches, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, Others

    Reprimand, Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • APD Murray
    SDT solicitor 10508/2010 2010-01-01 found breached

    Breaches, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, Others

    Suspend - Indefinite 1 PDF View decision
  • Peter Harry Perrey
    SDT solicitor 10509/2010 2010-01-01 found breached

    Breaches, Client Money, Criminal Convictions, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, Others

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Peter Procopi
    SDT solicitor 10588/2010 2010-01-01 found breached

    Breaches, Criminal Convictions

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • A Kyriacou - Y Mohammed
    SDT solicitor 10517/2010 2010-01-01 found breached

    Breaches, Criminal Convictions, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, Others

    S.43 Order (clerks), Suspend - Fixed Period 1 PDF View decision
  • Jonathan Martin Gilbert
    SDT solicitor 10532/2010 2010-01-01 found breached

    Breaches, Client Money, Failures

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Joanne Grace
    SDT solicitor 10450/2010 2010-01-01 found breached

    Breaches, Others, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision

Duty classification does not yet cover every jurisdiction (Ontario, New Zealand and Singapore decisions are indexed but not yet duty-classified), so counts here understate those corpora.