Decision record
Sean O’Neil Kinghorn
Allegation / charges
Fined | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered January 12, 2013. View PDF DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE GENERAL LEGAL COUNCIL COMPLAINT No. 173/2010 IN THE MATTER of a complaint by THOMAS ROSE against SEAN KINGHORN, an Attorney-at-Law AND …
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
The Disciplinary Committee found that attorney Sean Kinghorn breached Canon IV(r) by failing to deal with client Thomas Rose's motor vehicle accident claim with due expedition and failing to keep him informed of its progress. The attorney filed a claim in 2004 but the client remained in the dark as to its status, and the attorney failed to attend any hearings or respond to the complaint. The Committee imposed a fine of $600,000 (with $500,000 payable to the complainant) plus $6,000 costs. No dishonesty was found.
Duties found breached:
Aggravating factors:
- Egregious failure to communicate with client
- Failure to provide written explanation about the status of the case
- Delay and want of expedition between 2004 and 2008
- Failure to attend or respond to the complaint
⚠ figures not found verbatim in the source were dropped: ["unverified_fine_amount=600000"]
Duties engaged
Other decisions involving this respondent
Matched by respondent name — may include a different person with the same name.
Documents
Source: https://www.generallegalcouncil.org/judgement/sean-o-neil-kinghorn-complaint-no-173-of-2010/