Decision record
Chandra Soares
Allegation / charges
Struck off | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered February 12, 2011. View PDF JUDGMENT OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE GENERAL LEGAL COUNCILCOMPLAINT No. 116 OF 2008 BETWEEN KENNETH CHUNG COMPLAINANT AND CHANDRA SOARES RESPONDENT PANEL:PAMELA E. BENKA-COKER Q.C.BERYL ENNISCHARLES …
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
Jamaican attorney Chandra Soares had carriage of the sale of the complainant's property at 50 Barbican Road for $35,500,000. She prepared an agreement showing a reduced price of $25,500,000, miscalculated costs on that lower figure, and failed to pay the complainant the full net proceeds, withholding $7,985,424.76 which she converted to her own use (partly given to a church at the Bishop's request). She falsely claimed the complainant agreed to lend her the shortfall via a promissory note he never saw. The tribunal found dishonesty and conversion of client funds proven beyond reasonable doubt. Although she refunded the sum with interest and costs, the panel found her conduct egregious and ordered her struck from the Roll, with no order as to costs.
Duties found breached:
- Uphold public trust in the profession
- Prompt accounting and return of money
- Report serious misconduct of others
Aggravating factors:
- Breach of trust reposed by the client
- Knowingly converted client funds ($7,985,424.76) to her own use and/or benefit of others without consent
- Knowingly miscalculated costs on a purchase price of $25,500,000 instead of $35,500,000
- Prepared a promissory note the complainant never saw or agreed to
- Egregious conduct bringing the profession into disrepute
Mitigating factors:
- Refunded the total misappropriated sum with interest and legal costs on 19 December 2008
- Did not seek to deny wrongly using the client's funds
- Cooperative and admitted the material allegations
- 25 years in practice with no prior problems with this client
Duties engaged
Other decisions involving this respondent
Matched by respondent name — may include a different person with the same name.
Documents
Source: https://www.generallegalcouncil.org/judgement/chandra-soares-complaint-no-116-of-2008/