Decision record
Charles Valentine Fraser-Macnamara
Allegation / charges
Breaches
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
The Respondent, sole director of EDL, was found to have caused or allowed misrepresentations to investors (that EDL owned land, was an approved supplier under a Brazilian government scheme, that funds were secure, use of the Olympic logo, and ISO 9001 accreditation), failed to maintain adequate accounting records, profited from and misled the public into investing in EDL which was a Ponzi scheme, and involved himself in dubious transactions bearing hallmarks of fraud/money laundering. Dishonesty was found proved for Allegations 1.1.1 (land ownership), 1.1.3 (security of funds), 1.2 (accounting records), 1.3 (Ponzi scheme) and 1.4 (dubious transactions). Allegations 1.5.1 and 1.5.2 were found not proved and breach of Principle 3 was not proved. Investors lost at least £21 million. The Tribunal was heard in the Respondent's absence. He was struck off the Roll and ordered to pay costs of £22,725.
Duties found breached:
- Proper basis for allegations
- Integrity
- Uphold public trust in the profession
- Handle inadvertently received material
- No improper use of client money
Aggravating factors:
- Dishonest conduct that was calculated and repeated over a period of 2.5 years
- Significant efforts to conceal wrongdoing from EDL creditors, liquidator, Department of Trade and Industry and the Tribunal
- Substantial harm - loss of at least £21 million of investors' deposits
- Previous Tribunal finding relating to his involvement with EDL
- Misled the Applicant through contradictory and untrue statements
- Financial motivation; used his solicitor status to lend a veneer of legitimacy
Mitigating factors:
- Engaged with the regulatory process
⚠ figures not found verbatim in the source were dropped: ["review_dishonesty_finding_cue_present"]
Duties engaged
- Proper basis for allegations
- Honesty
- Integrity
- Professional independence
- No bribery or improper gifts
- Personal probity and fitness to practise
- Uphold public trust in the profession
- No unlawful discrimination or harassment
- Act in the client's best interests
- Advise objectively, not a mere conduit
- Handle inadvertently received material
- No improper use of client money
- AML and crime-prevention compliance