Skip to main content
discipline 4 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Betty Igwebike Forde

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number12583/2024
Date27/11/2024
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Client Money, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Failures, Money Laundering Regulations, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2019, SRA Principles 2019

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 65,045
Dishonesty foundNo

Betty Igwebike Forde, sole Principal, COLP, COFA and MLRO of Anchor Legal Solicitors, was found to have committed serious and wide-ranging breaches of the SRA Accounts Rules between 31 July 2021 and 15 December 2022, including failing to keep accurate records, no central record of bills, mixing client and office money, and inadequate reconciliations. She also failed to properly account for client payments and returns of funds, and made or allowed LAA contract claims for hospital attendances for which there was insufficient evidence the visits took place. The Tribunal found manifest incompetence (an aggravating factor) proved for Allegations 1.1 and 1.2, and a lack of integrity in relation to the LAA claims (Allegation 1.4). No express finding of dishonesty was made. The Respondent did not attend and the hearing proceeded in her absence. She was struck off the Roll and ordered to pay costs of £65,044.75.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Manifest incompetence (found proved in relation to Allegations 1.1 and 1.2)
  • Lack of integrity
  • High culpability - direct control and responsibility as sole Principal, COLP, COFA and MLRO
  • Conduct repeated over a significant period (over 16 months)
  • Failure to remedy breaches despite repeated opportunities and warnings during forensic investigation
  • Made claims for public funds (LAA) without supporting evidence
  • Serious harm to reputation of the profession

Mitigating factors:

  • Offered to repay sums identified in the LAA review and accepted there were shortcomings

Codes & rules applied

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/12583/