Skip to main content
discipline 4 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

John Stanley Wayman

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number8688/2002
Date01/01/2002
OutcomeSuspend - Indefinite

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Failures, Others

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionSuspension
CostsGBP 2,328
Dishonesty foundNo

John Stanley Wayman, a solicitor admitted in 1973, admitted acting as a solicitor without a Practising Certificate (Jan-Nov 2001) and breaching the Solicitors Indemnity Rules 2000. His practice was intervened in November 2001. The Tribunal accepted these were serious breaches of fundamental professional obligations but noted extensive mitigation including depression, overwork, glowing references, and absence of any dishonesty. Given his prior 1988 appearance (also involving uncertificated practice) combined with the current facts, the Tribunal imposed an indefinite suspension rather than striking off, recommending he provide psychiatric confirmation of fitness before seeking to lift it and work under supervision. He was ordered to pay costs of £2,327.73.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Previous appearance before the Tribunal in 1988 which also involved practising uncertificated
  • Continued practising uncertificated even after being warned by the OSS on 19 July 2001 that this could be grounds for intervention
  • Failed to respond to correspondence from the OSS and insurers

Mitigating factors:

  • Ill health, including depression over some 3 years, supported by psychiatric evidence
  • Grossly overworking and devoting excessive time to clients' work, often for disadvantaged people
  • No dishonesty or financial irregularity; clients protected by assigned risks pool automatic cover
  • Glowing testimonials and references attesting to integrity and dedication
  • Parlous financial position, living on disability allowance
  • Admitted the allegations and had courage to attend the hearing

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/8688/