David Buckle

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

The SRA alleged that Mr Buckle, a solicitor and senior partner, acted with an own interest conflict, took advantage of a vulnerable client (Mrs A), failed to ensure proper contractual documentation, and/or took unfair advantage of her in relation to a property development project, loans, and accommodation. The Tribunal dismissed all allegations, finding Mr Buckle acted in his personal capacity as a financier and not as a solicitor for the Second Development Proposal, that Mrs A was not vulnerable but a 'formidable' person, and that his and Mrs A's interests were aligned so no conflict arose. Although he failed to ensure appropriate contractual documentation was in place, this benefited Mrs A and was to his detriment, so no misconduct was found. He was found to be honest and the only party who suffered loss. The Tribunal criticised the SRA's poor investigation and drafting and ordered the SRA to pay the Respondent £50,000 in costs.</summary>