Decision record
Waheed Ur Rehman Mian
Allegation / charges
Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, Failures, SRA Principles 2011
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
The Respondent, a solicitor and senior member/COLP/COFA of M-R Solicitors LLP, acted for clients purchasing off-plan properties from Aronex, a developer with significant undisclosed connections to the Firm (his wife was a director, Firm was landlord, and other Firm employees were involved). He failed to disclose the conflict of interest, failed to adequately advise clients of the risks of off-plan buyer-led investment schemes, failed to inform clients of planning permission issues before releasing funds, and failed to supervise a junior trainee. Aronex collapsed and investors lost deposits. The Tribunal found all allegations proved, including contested breaches of Principles 2 (integrity) and 3 (independence), rejecting his new defence that he was unaware of his wife's directorship. The Tribunal found lack of integrity but no dishonesty was alleged or found. He was suspended for 6 months and ordered to pay costs of £40,218.40.
Duties found breached:
- Proper basis for allegations
- Integrity
- Uphold public trust in the profession
- Act in the client's best interests
- Non-discriminatory acceptance and cab-rank
- Advise on alternatives, settlement and outcome
- No conflict between current clients
- Competence
- Firm governance, systems and compliance
Aggravating factors:
- Misconduct continued over a period exceeding two years
- Respondent knew or ought reasonably to have known conduct was in material breach of obligations
- Presented a new, fundamentally flawed defence during the hearing
- Lack of insight regarding misconduct
- Financial motivation found by the Tribunal
Mitigating factors:
- Cooperated with the regulator throughout the investigation
- Faced significant increase in professional indemnity insurance premium
- No previous disciplinary history
- Made efforts to ensure clients were compensated including through insurers
- Positive character references
Codes & rules applied
Duties engaged
- Proper basis for allegations
- Honesty
- Integrity
- Professional independence
- No bribery or improper gifts
- Personal probity and fitness to practise
- Uphold public trust in the profession
- No unlawful discrimination or harassment
- Act in the client's best interests
- Advise objectively, not a mere conduit
- Non-discriminatory acceptance and cab-rank
- Advise on alternatives, settlement and outcome
- No conflict between current clients
- Competence
- Firm governance, systems and compliance