Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Lennox Andrew Manifold

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number10611/2010
Date01/01/2010
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Failures, Others

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 23,000
Dishonesty foundYes

Michael Hole, a conveyancing partner, admitted four allegations: acting in transactions with suspicious characteristics, failing to act in the best interests of a vulnerable client (Mrs G), fabricating documents placed on her file, and failing to disclose material information to lender clients. The Tribunal found express dishonesty (applying Twinsectra) regarding the fabrication of documents, which were created or modified retrospectively when he feared investigation. Given the finding of dishonesty, he was struck off the Roll and ordered to pay agreed costs of £23,000.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Fabricated documents to cover his tracks when he feared investigation
  • Made admissions to Investigation Officer only when confronted with clear evidence rather than being frank
  • Client Mrs G was vulnerable due to severe debt problems
  • Attempted to improve his position when confronted with the complaint and potential claim

Mitigating factors:

  • Full and prompt admissions to all allegations including dishonesty
  • Cooperated with investigation and proceedings, saving time and costs
  • Resigned from partnership promptly and made himself available to tie up loose ends
  • Offered to come off the Roll
  • No personal financial advantage gained from the dishonesty
  • Attempted to remedy matters by paying £5,000 to Mrs G
  • No previous disciplinary matters

Duties engaged

Other decisions involving this respondent

  • 10611/2010 2010-01-01 · SDT · England & Wales · Prohibition Order

Matched by respondent name — may include a different person with the same name.

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/10611-2/