Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Hilary Louise Stone

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number7145/1996
Date01/01/1996
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Client Money, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, Others

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
Dishonesty foundNo

Hilary Louise Stone, senior/managing partner at Shindler & Co., admitted breaches of the Solicitors Accounts Rules and conduct unbefitting a solicitor by misusing approximately £453,000 of clients' funds (including local authority sale proceeds) and causing fictitious bills and false entries in the firm's books to conceal a client account shortage exceeding £600,000. The Tribunal found all allegations substantiated (uncontested) and, despite significant personal mitigation and strong testimonials, ordered that she be struck off the Roll and pay costs to be taxed if not agreed. The Tribunal did not expressly use the word 'dishonesty'.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Minimum cash shortage of approximately £453,000-£467,687 on client account
  • Fictitious bills of costs and improper entries created at her instigation
  • Misuse of local government authority client funds
  • Exposure of Solicitors' Indemnity Fund to substantial claim
  • Concealment of cash shortage exceeding £600,000 via fictitious postings
  • She was the senior/managing partner responsible for finances

Mitigating factors:

  • Long unblemished career and high professional standing
  • Testimonial letters from respected figures
  • Personal pressures: car accident and major surgery in 1993
  • Father's cancer diagnosis and death in 1993
  • Financial recession and insolvency of major clients
  • Introduced £150,000 and £100,000 (borrowed from mother) of her own money to reduce shortage
  • Attempted suicide upon discovery; profound remorse and shame
  • Not motivated by personal enrichment

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/7145/