§ discipline
‹ Browse decisions

Kengai Ponnampalam Chetty

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number10761/2011
Date01/01/2011
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Client Money, Failures, Others, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 30,000
Dishonesty foundYes

Sole practitioner conveyancer Kengai Ponnampalam Chetty faced nine allegations heard in his absence following his disappearance (believed to be in India). The Tribunal found all allegations proved, including dishonesty on five of them under the Twinsectra test. Over a roughly three-week period he gave undertakings to discharge charges which he never fulfilled, withdrew client/lender monies otherwise than in accordance with instructions, acted in conveyancing transactions (Gainford House and Devoran) exhibiting characteristics of fraud (including certifying a false passport copy), failed to comply with lender instructions, failed to keep proper accounting records and reconciliations, failed to produce documents to the SRA, and abandoned his practice. Over £760,000 was paid to unconnected entities. He was struck off the Roll and ordered to pay costs of £30,000 (reduced from £39,141.28).

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Coldly calculating misconduct with high level of manipulation of circumstances to his own advantage
  • Payment out of over £760,000 to entities unconnected with the conveyancing transactions
  • Accepted instructions on Devoran while planning to sell premises and go on holiday
  • Abandonment of practice and 'going to ground'
  • Substantial claims on the Compensation Fund
  • Benefitted from failure to discharge charges on properties he owned
  • Failure to engage with SRA or Tribunal

Duties engaged

Other decisions involving this respondent

  • 10761/2011 2011-01-01 · SDT · England & Wales · Strike off

Matched by respondent name — may include a different person with the same name.

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/10761/