Donovan O. Foote
Allegation / charges
Guilty of Professional Misconduct | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered April 11, 2017. || Fined/Conditional Suspension | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered February 23, 2018 View PDF DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE GENERAL LEGAL COUNCIL COMPLAINT NO: 90/2011 BETWEEN …
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
The Attorney, who had joint carriage of sale of a jointly owned property to be sold under a Supreme Court order, put the proposed purchaser (Mr. Moo Young) into possession and permitted construction/alterations to the property despite the purchaser never having signed the Agreement for Sale and without the consent of the complainant joint owner or her attorney. He conducted the sale as though his client (the former husband) was the sole vendor, failed to respond to the complainant's attorney's letters, refused to rescind a non-existent (unsigned) agreement, and acted with gross discourtesy. The Panel found the complainant credible and the Attorney's evidence self-serving and lacking credibility. Applying the criminal standard (beyond reasonable doubt), it found the complaint proven and the Attorney guilty of professional misconduct under Canons IV(s) and I(b). No express finding of dishonesty was made; the conduct was characterized as inexcusable/deplorable negligence. Sanction deferred to a separate hearing.
Duties found breached:
Aggravating factors:
- Attorney failed to submit written closing submissions despite ample opportunity
- Conduct caused irreversible structural alterations to the property
- Gross discourtesy to fellow attorney and disregard for the joint owner's rights
Duties engaged
Other decisions involving this respondent
Matched by respondent name — may include a different person with the same name.
Documents
Source: https://www.generallegalcouncil.org/judgement/donovan-o-foote-complaint-no-90-of-2011/