§ discipline
‹ Browse decisions

Lennox Andrew Manifold

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number10611/2010
Date01/01/2010
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Failures, Others

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 23,000
Dishonesty foundYes

The Respondent, a conveyancing partner at Hewitts Solicitors, admitted four allegations. He acted in transactions with suspicious characteristics involving bridging finance and connected parties, failed to act in the best interests of a vulnerable client (Mrs G) who received only £2,439.93 from her property sale, and failed to disclose material facts to his lender client (Birmingham Midshires) as required by the CML Handbook. Most seriously, he fabricated/backdated documents and placed them on Mrs G's file when he feared investigation. The Tribunal applied the Twinsectra test and found his conduct dishonest. He was struck off the Roll and ordered to pay agreed costs of £23,000.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Documents fabricated/backdated when he feared his conduct was about to be investigated
  • Made admissions only when confronted with clear evidence rather than being frank
  • Was 'less than frank' with the Investigation Officer
  • Client (Mrs G) was vulnerable due to severe debt problems
  • Attempted to improve his position after the client's complaint and potential claim

Mitigating factors:

  • Full and prompt admissions to all allegations including dishonesty
  • Co-operated with the investigation and proceedings
  • Resigned from the partnership forthwith
  • Offered to come off the Roll
  • No personal financial advantage from the dishonesty
  • Paid £5,000 to Mrs G as an attempt to put matters right
  • No previous disciplinary matters

Duties engaged

Other decisions involving this respondent

  • 10611/2010 2010-01-01 · SDT · England & Wales · Prohibition Order

Matched by respondent name — may include a different person with the same name.

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/10611-2/