No baseless or threatened misconduct report profession
The lawyer must not make or threaten a professional-misconduct allegation or report without a genuine, reasonably held and bona fide belief that it applies.
How the codes express this duty
E&W Solicitors SRA Principles & Code no clear equivalent
E&W Barristers BSB Handbook rC67 strong 50 cases
rC67 You must never make, or threaten to make, a report under Rule rC66 without a genuine and reasonably held belief that Rule rC66 applies.
BSB Handbook · current · archived copy · official source ↗
Cayman Islands Legal Services Code 2026 no clear equivalent
AU Solicitors Solicitors' Conduct Rules Rule 32.1 strong 7 cases
A solicitor must not make an allegation against another Australian legal practitioner of unsatisfactory professional conduct or professional misconduct unless the allegation is made bona fide and the solicitor believes on reasonable grounds that available material by which the allegation could be supported provides a proper basis for it.
Australian Solicitors' Conduct Rules · 2015 (June 2026 compilation) · archived copy · official source ↗
AU Barristers Uniform Barristers Rules no clear equivalent
IE Solicitors Law Society Guide no clear equivalent
IE Barristers Bar Code of Conduct no clear equivalent
JM Attorneys Canons of Professional Ethics no clear equivalent
JE Lawyers Law Society of Jersey Code no clear equivalent
ON Lawyers LSO Rules of Prof. Conduct r 3.2-5(b); r 7.1-3 commentary [1] partial
3.2-5 A lawyer shall not, in an attempt to gain a benefit for a client, threaten, or advise a client to threaten, without reasonable and lawful justification ... (b) to make a complaint to a regulatory authority. [7.1-3 commentary [1]: In all cases, the report must be made without malice or ulterior motive. 3.2-5 commentary [1]: It is an abuse of the process of a court or, ordinarily, a regulatory authority to threaten to make or advance a charge or complaint in order to secure the satisfaction of a private grievance.]
Law Society of Ontario — Rules of Professional Conduct · current · archived copy · official source ↗
BC Lawyers BC Code r 7.1-3, commentary [2] partial 41 cases
Nothing in this paragraph is meant to interfere with the lawyer-client relationship. In all cases, the report must be made without malice or ulterior motive.
Code of Professional Conduct for British Columbia (BC Code) · 2017 · archived copy · official source ↗
NZ Lawyers Conduct & Client Care Rules r 2.10 strong
A lawyer must not use, or threaten to use, the complaints or disciplinary process for an improper purpose.
Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 · SR 2008/214 · archived copy · official source ↗
SCO Solicitors LSS Standards of Conduct no clear equivalent
SG Lawyers Professional Conduct Rules 2015 r 29 (Allegations against another legal practitioner) partial
29 Allegations against another legal practitioner
Legal Profession (Professional Conduct) Rules 2015 · 2015 · archived copy · official source ↗
HK Solicitors Solicitors' Guide no clear equivalent
HK Barristers Bar Code of Conduct para 10.50 partial
A practising barrister shall not make any allegation of misconduct or dishonesty against another barrister unless such allegation is supported by reasonably credible evidence.
Code of Conduct of the Bar of the Hong Kong SAR · 2018 · archived copy · official source ↗
Cases dealing with this duty
303 decisions · link basis: found breached = a tribunal finding; rule cited = the mapped provision is cited in the decision; text match = high-precision text pattern
-
Jermaine Ryan Simms
Restitution Ordered | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered October 12, 2017. View PDF View Decision SANCTION DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE GENERAL LEGAL COUNCIL COMPLAINT NO: 48/2009 IN THE MATTER O…
Restitution Ordered 1 PDF -
strike_off No Appeal 4 PDFs
-
Lesley Dee Layton
Breaches
Strike off 1 PDF -
Final 1 PDF
-
strike_off No Appeal 1 PDF
-
Andrew Christopher Aitchison
Breaches, Failures
Strike off 1 PDF -
Victoria Emma Craig
Breaches, Solicitors' Accounts Rules
Strike off 1 PDF -
Christopher Charles Edward Hayes
Breaches
Strike off 1 PDF -
David Masao Saito
Agreed Statement of Facts
Agreed Statement of Facts 1 PDF -
Donald Alexander Gittens
Reprimanded | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered April 22, 2015. View PDF DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE GENERAL LEGAL COUNCIL COMPLAINT NO: 8/2013 IN THE MATTER OF INDRA BAHADUR and DONALD GITTENS…
Reprimanded 1 PDF -
Final 1 PDF
-
Andrew Christopher Lee
Agreed Statement of Facts
Agreed Statement of Facts 1 PDF -
Tarik Akhtar
Breaches
Strike off 1 PDF -
Alan Blacker
Breaches, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, Others
Strike off 1 PDF -
Marcus Paul Nickson
Breaches, Failures
Strike off 1 PDF -
Dalida Rajeshree Jhugroo
Breaches, Failures
Strike off 1 PDF -
Stephen John Acres
Breaches, Client Money, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules
Strike off 1 PDF -
Matthew Charles Curtis
Breaches, Criminal Convictions
Strike off 1 PDF -
Mr Michael FREELAND
Findings of professional misconduct and unsatisfactory professional conduct Reasons for decision Reasons for penalty
Practising Certificate not to be granted for 12 months Practitioner not to be issued with an unrestricted PC until 2 years supervised practice completed 1 PDF -
Final 1 PDF
-
Raffaele Crescenzo
Agreed Statement of Facts
Agreed Statement of Facts 1 PDF -
Elsie A. Taylor
Repayment Ordered | Disciplinary Committee decision & Review delivered November 28, 2003. | Decision affirmed on appeal View PDF DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE GENERAL LEGAL COUNCIL Complaint# 175 of 1996…
Repayment Ordered 1 PDF -
Arlean D. Moreta Beckford
Arlean D. Moreta Beckford: Complaint No. 146 of 2002 Posted on February 10, 2014 by GLC Web Admin July 5, 2024 Reply Notice of Intention for Preliminary Submissions | filed October 15, 2003. View PDF NOTICE OF INTENTION…
other 1 PDF -
Jude Darrel Godson
Breaches, Others
Strike off 1 PDF -
Louis Stanley Spragg
Breaches, Failures, Others
Strike off 1 PDF
Duty classification does not yet cover every jurisdiction (Ontario, New Zealand and Singapore decisions are indexed but not yet duty-classified), so counts here understate those corpora.