The duty in context
No improper communication with the court court
The lawyer must not communicate with the court on a matter of substance in the opponent's absence except where permitted, and must promptly disclose to the opponent any such communication.
How the codes express this duty
E&W Solicitors SRA Principles & Code no clear equivalent
E&W Barristers BSB Handbook no clear equivalent
Cayman Islands Legal Services Code 2026 no clear equivalent
AU Solicitors Solicitors' Conduct Rules Rules 22.5; 22.6 strong 110 cases
22.5 A solicitor must not, outside an ex parte application or a hearing of which an opponent has had proper notice, communicate in the opponent's absence with the court concerning any matter of substance in connection with current proceedings unless: ... 22.6 A solicitor must promptly tell the opponent what passes between the solicitor and a court in a communication referred to in Rule 22.5.
Australian Solicitors' Conduct Rules · 2015 (June 2026 compilation) · archived copy · official source ↗
AU Barristers Uniform Barristers Rules rr53-54 strong 50 cases
A barrister must not, outside an ex parte application or a hearing of which an opponent has had proper notice, communicate in the opponent's absence with the court concerning any matter of substance in connection with current proceedings unless [permitted]. A barrister must promptly tell an opponent what passes between the barrister and a court in a communication referred to in Rule 53.
Legal Profession Uniform Conduct (Barristers) Rules · 2015 (as amended 14 May 2025) · archived copy · official source ↗
IE Solicitors Law Society Guide Ch5 — Communication with the court strong 83 cases
A solicitor should not discuss the merits of a case with the judge, registrar, clerk or other official before whom a case is pending. Where during the case a written communication to the court is required, the solicitor should deliver a copy of the communication to the opposing party.
Solicitor's Guide to Professional Conduct (Law Society of Ireland) · 4th ed. (2022) · archived copy · official source ↗
IE Barristers Bar Code of Conduct Rule 5.28; Rule 5.29 strong 83 cases
Barristers shall not approach a Judge to discuss with them any matter then pending or at hearing before that Judge without the consent of the Judge and their opposing lawyer or lay litigant being present during such approach.
Code of Conduct for the Bar of Ireland · 2024 · archived copy · official source ↗
JM Attorneys Canons of Professional Ethics Canon V(i) partial 38 cases
In any proceeding in a Court an Attorney shall not communicate or cause any other person to communicate with a juror as to the merits of such proceedings, and shall only do so with a Judge or person exercising Judicial functions:- (i) in the normal course of the proceedings, or (ii) where authorised by law, or the practice of the Courts or with the consent of the parties.
Legal Profession (Canons of Professional Ethics) Rules · 1978 (principal) · archived copy · official source ↗
JE Lawyers Law Society of Jersey Code G.3.4 partial
Members must not discuss the merits of a case with a member of the judiciary before whom a case is pending or by whom it may be heard unless invited to do so in the presence of the lawyer for the other side.
Law Society of Jersey Code of Conduct · 1 January 2017 · archived copy · official source ↗
ON Lawyers LSO Rules of Prof. Conduct r 5.1-2(d) partial
When acting as an advocate, a lawyer shall not ... endeavour or allow anyone else to endeavour, directly or indirectly, to influence the decision or action of a tribunal or any of its officials in any case or matter by any means other than open persuasion as an advocate
Law Society of Ontario — Rules of Professional Conduct · current · archived copy · official source ↗
BC Lawyers BC Code r 2.1-2(d) partial 24 cases
A lawyer should never seek privately to influence a court or tribunal, directly or indirectly, in the lawyer's or a client's favour, nor should the lawyer attempt to curry favour with juries by fawning, flattery or pretended solicitude for their personal comfort.
Code of Professional Conduct for British Columbia (BC Code) · 2017 · archived copy · official source ↗
NZ Lawyers Conduct & Client Care Rules r 13.2.2 strong
A lawyer must not discuss any case or matter before the court with any judicial officer involved in the proceeding either formally or informally outside of the rules of procedure ... In cases of doubt, the lawyers for other parties (or if a party is not represented, then the party concerned) should be informed of any matters being brought before the court.
Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 · SR 2008/214 · archived copy · official source ↗
SCO Solicitors LSS Standards of Conduct no clear equivalent
SG Lawyers Professional Conduct Rules 2015 r 30 (Communication with court) partial 10 cases
30 Communication with court
Legal Profession (Professional Conduct) Rules 2015 · 2015 · archived copy · official source ↗
HK Solicitors Solicitors' Guide Principle 10.02 Commentary 2-3 strong
Except in the course of an application to the court, a solicitor must not discuss the merits of the case with a judge, magistrate or other adjudicator before whom a case is pending ... unless invited to do so in the presence of the solicitor or barrister for the other side ... a solicitor shall at the same time deliver a copy of it to his professional adversary.
Hong Kong Solicitors' Guide to Professional Conduct (Volume 1) · current · archived copy · official source ↗
HK Barristers Bar Code of Conduct para 10.48 strong
A practising barrister must not, outside of an ex parte application or a hearing of which an opponent has had proper notice, communicate in the opponent's absence with the Court concerning any matter of substance in connection with current proceedings unless ... A practising barrister must promptly inform an opponent of what has passed between the barrister and the Court in a communication referred to in sub-paragraph (a) hereof.
Code of Conduct of the Bar of the Hong Kong SAR · 2018 · archived copy · official source ↗
Cases dealing with this duty
765 decisions · link basis: found breached = a tribunal finding; rule cited = the mapped provision is cited in the decision; text match = high-precision text pattern
-
Mitchell Cavanagh
The conduct identified in charge 1 is proved and is found to constitute professional misconduct.
-
-
Buckley, Nathan Andrew
Proceedings no. 2023/00140580 (Social Media Application) 1. Made public statements encouraging residents To breach laws by providing false information to the ASIC for the purpose of avoiding the effect of applicable pub…
Costs Order recommending removal of lawyer's name from the Supreme Court Roll $0.00 1 PDF View decision -
Alejandro Emilio Verdu Haro
Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019
-
Neil Robert Lawler
OCR198-23 Charges 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 - professional misconduct. OCR050-25 Charges 1 to 4 - professional misconduct
-
-
Ano Maggielin Miller Sewell
Guilty | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered May 31, 2025. || Struck off, Restitution Ordered | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered June 27, 2025. View PDF DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE GENER…
-
Maisha Shamilla Wilson-Campbell
Guilty of Professional Misconduct | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered May 28, 2025. || Suspended | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered July 01, 2025. View PDF DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE …
-
-
Debby-Ann Samuels
Guilty of Professional Misconduct | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered April 14, 2025. || Suspended | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered December 12, 2025. View PDF DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE O…
-
Leonard Hil Marriott
Rule 4-29 Admission of Misconduct and Undertaking to the Discipline Committee
-
Robin Edward Stubbings
Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, SRA Principles 2019
-
Gregory George Dureault
Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement
-
-
-
Waterstreet, Charles Christian
1. where the barrister engaged in sexual harassment towards three separate complainants 2. where he was found to have breached the New South Wales Barristers Rules, and engaged in conduct likely to diminish public confi…
The barrister is reprimanded pursuant to s 299(1)(b) and s 302(1) of the Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW). The barrister is prohibited from applying for an Australian practising certificate before the end of one year from the date of the orders. $0.00 Disciplinary Action 2 PDFs View decision -
Naeem-ul-Nushad Ahmed
Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement
-
Manjit Singh Walia
Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement
-
Martin Smith
Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2019
-
-
Shen, Hao (Wilson) Ran
Failure to attend Court on 20 October 2022 without reasonable excuse. On 13 November 2023, the Acting NSW Legal Services Commissioner made a finding of Unsatisfactory Professional Conduct and Mr Shen was reprimanded. On…
Reprimand $0.00 Specified Duration: Manager appointment for a period of 2 years Manager Appointed: Yes Manager Appointed 1 PDF View decision -
Kazas-Rogaris, Anne
On 29 April 2022, the Professional Conduct Committee (Committee) of the Law Society of New South Wales resolved to do the following: (1) Find Ms Kazas-Rogaris guilty of unsatisfactory professional conduct on the basis t…
-
-
-
Lee, Pei Sze
Failed to cooperate with, and thereby obstructed, the manager appointed to the Law Practice under s 334 of the Legal Profession Uniform Law (Ground 1) Participated in the affairs of the Law Practice after service on her…
Costs Fine Lawyer to undertake and complete further ethics education Reprimand The Lawyer may not apply for a practising certificate that would authorise her to be a principal of a law practice until after she has held five (5) practising certificates in five (5) separate practising certificate years that authorise her to engage in supervised legal practice only $10,000.00 1 PDF View decision
Duty classification does not yet cover every jurisdiction (Ontario, New Zealand and Singapore decisions are indexed but not yet duty-classified), so counts here understate those corpora.