Barrington E. Frankson
Allegation / charges
Struck off, Restitution ordered | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered May 01, 1999 | Court of Appeal Decision | Privy Council Decision View PDF DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE GENERAL LEGAL COUNCIL COMPLAINT NO. 5197 BASIL WHITTER At …
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
The Disciplinary Committee of the General Legal Council found attorney Barrington Earl Frankson guilty of professional misconduct in relation to his handling of client Monica Whitter's matrimonial property claims. After obtaining judgments securing her half-share in 'Cromarty', he failed to enforce them, never laid a bill of costs for her, then sued her for contingency fees (without complying with s.22 LPA), obtained default judgment, and through his firm (which had carriage of sale) sold her interest, receiving over $8 million. He paid out fees to himself, W.B. Frankson and the firm, failed to account to the client or court, refused to place funds in an interest-bearing account, and paid the client nothing. The tribunal applied the criminal standard of proof, found he had no lien, misapplied trust funds, lacked integrity/probity/trustworthiness, and engaged in disgraceful and dishonourable conduct. It ordered him struck off the roll and to make restitution of the full purchase price (less vendor's costs) plus interest. No express finding of 'dishonesty' was stated, and no fine or costs were imposed.
Duties found breached:
- Disclose adverse law to the court
- Proper basis for allegations
- No taking unfair advantage
- Uphold public trust in the profession
- Keep client informed and respond promptly
- No conflict between current clients
- No improper use of client money
Aggravating factors:
- Misused and misapplied the complainant's funds in a deliberate course of conduct
- Abused the process of the courts to legitimise proceedings that ought not to have been pursued
- Clear conflict of interest
- Failed to pay over any balance to the client since October 1996
- Failed to produce books of account/bank statements despite subpoena
- Suppressed history of the case from the court via a specially endorsed writ
Mitigating factors:
- Attorney was a fairly young man with a family
- Being an attorney was his means of livelihood
Duties engaged
Other decisions involving this respondent
Matched by respondent name — may include a different person with the same name.
Documents
Source: https://www.generallegalcouncil.org/judgement/barrington-e-frankson-complaint-no-5-of-1997/