Skip to main content
discipline 2 October 2026

The duty in context

No tampering with or coaching witnesses court

The lawyer must not tamper with, fabricate or suppress evidence, encourage false or misleading evidence, coach or rehearse a witness on their evidence, or improperly confer with a witness during their evidence.

42 cases 60% strike-off avg suspension 12.0 mo avg fine 10,000 2 with dishonesty finding

How the codes express this duty

E&W Solicitors SRA Principles & Code CCS 2.1; CCS 2.2 strong 22 cases
2.1 You do not misuse or tamper with evidence or attempt to do so. 2.2 You do not seek to influence the substance of evidence, including generating false evidence or persuading witnesses to change their evidence.
E&W Barristers BSB Handbook rC9.3; rC9.4; rC9.5 strong 9 cases
rC9.3 you must not encourage a witness to give evidence which is misleading or untruthful; .4 you must not rehearse, practise with or coach a witness in respect of their evidence; .5 unless you have the permission of the representative for the opposing side or of the court, you must not communicate with any witness (including your client) about the case while the witness is giving evidence;
Cayman Islands Legal Services Code 2026 R.3.2(c); R.3.2(d); R.3.2(e) strong
not encourage a witness to give evidence which is misleading or untruthful; not rehearse, practise with or coach a witness in respect of the witness' evidence; not communicate with any witness (including a client) about the case while the witness is giving evidence
AU Solicitors Solicitors' Conduct Rules Rules 24.1; 25.1; 26.1 strong 8 cases
24.1 A solicitor must not: 24.1.1 advise or suggest to a witness that false or misleading evidence should be given nor condone another person doing so; or 24.1.2 coach a witness by advising what answers the witness should give to questions which might be asked.
AU Barristers Uniform Barristers Rules rr68-70,72 strong 3 cases
A barrister must not: (a) advise or suggest to a witness that false or misleading evidence should be given nor condone another person doing so; or (b) coach a witness by advising what answers the witness should give to questions which might be asked. ... must not encourage the witness to give evidence different from the evidence which the witness believes to be true.
IE Solicitors Law Society Guide Ch5 — Interviewing witnesses; Witness in the course of giving evidence strong
provided there is no question of tampering with the evidence of a witness or suborning them to change their story... When a witness is in the course of being cross-examined, a solicitor shall not, without the leave of the court, discuss the case with the witness.
IE Barristers Bar Code of Conduct Rule 5.11; Rule 5.12 strong
Barristers may not coach a witness in regard to the evidence to be given. ... Barristers shall not confer with a witness while such witness is under cross-examination without prior leave of the other parties or the Court.
JM Attorneys Canons of Professional Ethics Canon V(m); Canon V(k) partial
(m) An Attorney shall not knowingly use perjured testimony or false evidence or participate in the creation or use of evidence which he knows to be false. ... (k) An Attorney shall not for the purpose of making any person unavailable as a witness, advise or cause that person to secrete himself or leave the jurisdiction of the Court
JE Lawyers Law Society of Jersey Code R.4.2 c)-e) strong
Members must: ... c) not encourage a witness to give evidence which is misleading or untruthful; d) not rehearse, practise with or coach a witness in respect of their evidence unless the member has the permission of the representative for the opposing side or of the court; e) not communicate with any witness (including their client) about the case while the witness is giving evidence.
ON Lawyers LSO Rules of Prof. Conduct r 5.1-2A; r 5.4-2(b) strong
5.1-2A A lawyer shall not counsel or participate in the concealment, destruction or alteration of incriminating physical evidence or otherwise act so as to obstruct or attempt to obstruct the course of justice. [5.4-2(b): during cross-examination by an opposing legal practitioner, the witness's own lawyer ought not to have any conversation with the witness about the witness's evidence or any issue in the proceeding.]
BC Lawyers BC Code r 5.1-2.1 strong 2 cases
A lawyer must not counsel or participate in the concealment, destruction or alteration of incriminating physical evidence so as to obstruct or attempt to obstruct the course of justice.
NZ Lawyers Conduct & Client Care Rules r 13.10.8 strong
A lawyer must not suggest to a witness or potential witness, whether expressly or impliedly, that false or misleading evidence ought to be given or that evidence should be suppressed.
SCO Solicitors LSS Standards of Conduct no clear equivalent
SG Lawyers Professional Conduct Rules 2015 r 12 (Communications and dealings with witnesses) partial 1 case
12 Communications and dealings with witnesses
HK Solicitors Solicitors' Guide Principle 10.12 Commentary 2 / Principle 10.28 strong
A solicitor must not tamper with the evidence of a witness or attempt to suborn the witness into changing his evidence. ... Training or coaching of witnesses in criminal proceedings (whether for prosecution or defence) is not permitted.
HK Barristers Bar Code of Conduct para 10.25 strong
A practising barrister must not coach or encourage any witness to give evidence different from the evidence which the witness believes to be true.

Cases dealing with this duty

Clear

42 decisions · link basis: found breached = a tribunal finding; rule cited = the mapped provision is cited in the decision; text match = high-precision text pattern

  • Chinwe Uzo Chikwendu; Undiga Emuekpere
    SDT solicitor 12521/2023 2026-04-27 text match

    Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Reprimand, Suspend - Fixed Period 1 PDF View decision
  • Timothy Chi-Kwan Wan
    LSBC lawyer 2026-04-10 text match

    Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement

    Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement 1 PDF View decision
  • Nasar Hussain
    SDT solicitor 12688/2024 2025-10-24 text match

    Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, SRA Principles 2019

    Suspended period of Suspension 1 PDF View decision
  • Liaqat Ali
    SDT solicitor 12659/2024 2025-05-16 text match

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Firms 2019, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Failures, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Ahmed Ajina
    SDT solicitor 12666/2024 2025-04-14 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • van Langenberg, Carmeline Elaine
    OLSC solicitor Langenberg Law 2024-05-09 found breached rule cited

    The Solicitor sent intimidating correspondence in breach of Rule 34 of the Legal Profession Uniform Law Australian Solicitors' Conduct Rules. The Solicitor breached Rule 25 of the Solicitors' Rules by conferring with mo…

    Reprimand Complete legal ethics training with the Professional Support Unit of the Law Society of NSW $0.00 About ​ About the OLSC The Commissioner History Mission statement Structure Contact ​ Contact the OLSC Give us your feedback: online surveys Access to information (GIPAA) Community information ​ Information for lawyers Fact sheets FAQs Other regulatory and complaint-handling organisations Contact LawAccess NSW for legal information " You and Your Lawyer", Hot ​​Topics 78 Legal Information Access Centre (LIAC), State Library of NSW​ , provides access to information about the law in NSW regarding your lawyer Privacy Copyright and Disclaimer Website accessibility View decision
  • Stephen Taylor
    BTAS barrister Inner Temple 2024-04-10 rule cited
    suspension appealed 1 PDF View decision
  • Amanda Marie Lennon
    SDT solicitor 12541/2024 2024-02-23 text match

    Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Lewis Tresman
    BTAS barrister Gray's Inn 2024-02-19 rule cited
    strike_off open to appeal 2 PDFs View decision
  • Carly Walters
    BTAS barrister Lincoln's Inn 2023-09-28 rule cited
    strike_off Final 1 PDF View decision
  • Preetka Brar
    LSBC lawyer 2023-02-07 found breached

    Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement

    Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement 1 PDF View decision
  • Soophia Khan
    SDT solicitor 12323/2022 2022-09-08 text match

    Breaches, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Ashley Peter Barry Attwood
    SDT solicitor 12279/2021 2022-04-19 text match

    Criminal Convictions

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Roger Paul Jackson & Second Respondent & Third Respondent
    SDT solicitor 11921/2019 2019-01-01 text match

    Breaches, Failures

    Fine, Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Alastair James McGregor Gilfillan
    SDT solicitor 12010/2019 2019-01-01 text match

    Breaches

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Angelina Mary Rigby
    SDT solicitor 11986/2019 2019-01-01 text match

    Breaches

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Baljinder Hayre
    SDT solicitor 11834/2018 2018-01-01 text match

    Breaches

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Anthony Robert Dart
    SDT solicitor 11511/2016 2016-01-01 text match

    Others

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Katherine Juliet Gadsby
    SDT solicitor 11348/2015 2015-01-01 text match

    Criminal Convictions

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • David Benaim
    SDT solicitor 11406/2015 2015-01-01 text match

    Breaches, Failures

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Stephen John Acres
    SDT solicitor 11416/2015 2015-01-01 text match

    Breaches, Client Money, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • TREVOR HOWARD BRICKHILL
    LPBWA lawyer PO Box 1513 WEST PERTH WA 6872 Legal Practitioners Complaints Committee v Brickhill [2013] WASC 369 2013-10-09 text match

    Struck Off the Roll of Practitioners

    Struck Off the Roll of Practitioners 1 PDF View decision
  • John James
    SDT solicitor 11026/2012 2012-01-01 text match

    Breaches, Others

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • TRICIA Y. BACHMANN
    LPBWA lawyer PO Box 1502 SOUTH PERTH WA 6951 Legal Profession Complaints Committee v Bachmann [2011] WASC 309 2011-11-15 found breached

    Struck Off the Roll of Practitioners

    Struck Off the Roll of Practitioners 1 PDF View decision
  • Ng Bock Hoh Dixon
    SG-DT lawyer Dixon Ng & Co 2011-09-28 rule cited
    Struck off the roll with immediate effect 1 PDF View decision

Duty classification does not yet cover every jurisdiction (Ontario, New Zealand and Singapore decisions are indexed but not yet duty-classified), so counts here understate those corpora.