Abdul-Karim, Michael Saadey
Allegation / charges
<p>The Tribunal found Abdul-Karim guilty on two counts of professional misconduct in that</p><p>1. The description attributed by Abdul-Karim to a caveatable interest lodged on behalf of a client, at least to the extent of the claimed trust, was false</p><p>2. Abdul-Karim referred in the Caveat to an appeal, when he had no knowledge that any such appeal had been brought</p> — Common Law Professional Misconduct
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
The Tribunal found Abdul-Karim guilty of two counts of common law professional misconduct: falsely describing a caveatable interest lodged for a client (as regards the claimed trust) and referring in the Caveat to an appeal without knowledge that any such appeal existed. No express finding of dishonesty was made in the provided text, and no sanction is stated.
Duties found breached:
⚠ figures not found verbatim in the source were dropped: ["extracted_from_register_summary"]
Duties engaged
Other decisions involving this respondent
Matched by respondent name — may include a different person with the same name.
Documents
No documents recorded.
Source: https://portal.olsc.nsw.gov.au/dasearchbn/daresultdetail?id=092e510a-b733-eb11-bf74-000d3ad1941e