§ discipline
‹ Browse decisions

Fitzsimons, Christopher Ronald

JurisdictionAustralia — New South Wales
BodyOffice of the Legal Services Commissioner (NSW) (OLSC)
Professionsolicitor — C R Fitzsimons
Case number[2012] NSWADT 285
Date11-Sep-2012
HearingLegal Services Division of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal
OutcomeCosts Removal of practitioner's name from the Roll of Local Lawyers $0.00 Proceedings Instituted

Allegation / charges

<p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">1. Misappropriation</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">2. Breaches of Section 254 of the Legal Profession Act 2004 - Failure to deposit trust money in a general trust account/failure to deal with money as directed</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">3. Breaches of Section 257 of the Legal Profession Act 2004 - Failure to pay or deliver trust money as required by instructions</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">4. Breaches of Section 260 of the Legal Profession Act 2004 - Intermixing trust money with other money</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">5. Breaches of Section 264 of the Legal Profession Act 2004 - Failure to keep proper trust records</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">6. Wilful breach of Section 62 of the Legal Profession Act 1987 - handling of trust monies</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">7. Breach of Supreme Court orders</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">8. Borrowing from clients in breach of Rule 12 of the Solicitors' Rules</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">9. Making false entries in the official trust account cash book and/or trust ledger</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">10. Intermingling trust money with money belonging to the practitioner - other person</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">11. Misleading the Supreme Court</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">12. Misleading the District Court</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">13. Swearing false affidavits</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">14. Misleading or attempt to mislead the Administrative Decisions Tribunal</span></p> — Professional Misconduct

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionOther
Dishonesty foundNo

The excerpt sets out 14 particulars of professional misconduct against a solicitor, including misappropriation of trust money, multiple breaches of trust-accounting provisions of the Legal Profession Act 2004 and 1987, making false trust records, borrowing from clients, breaching Supreme Court orders, misleading the Supreme and District Courts and the Administrative Decisions Tribunal, and swearing false affidavits. The text is only a list of charges labelled Professional Misconduct; it contains no express tribunal findings, no express finding of dishonesty, and no stated sanction, fine, or costs order.

Duties found breached:

⚠ figures not found verbatim in the source were dropped: ["extracted_from_register_summary"]

Duties engaged

Other decisions involving this respondent

  • Decision 2005-12-21 · OLSC · Australia — New South Wales · Immediate suspension of Practising Certificate $0.00 About …

Matched by respondent name — may include a different person with the same name.

Documents

No documents recorded.

Source: https://portal.olsc.nsw.gov.au/dasearchbn/daresultdetail?id=795aa7df-b633-eb11-bf74-000d3ad1941e