Jennifer Jacqueline Housen
Allegation / charges
Guilty of Professional Misconduct | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered April 25, 2024. | Suspended, Restitution Ordered | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered April 15, 2025. View PDF DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE GENERAL LEGAL COUNCIL COMPLAINT NO: 75/2021 …
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
In Minett Lawrence v General Legal Council [2022] JMCA Misc 1, the Disciplinary Committee had found the attorney guilty of professional misconduct including dishonesty and struck her off. On appeal, the Court of Appeal allowed the appeal in part: the GLC conceded and the Court found that the express finding of dishonesty (and breaches of canons IV(r) and VII(b)(ii) for failing to account for funds) was not supported by evidence to the criminal standard, and set those findings aside. However, the Court affirmed findings of breach of canon IV(k) (conflict of interest), canon IV(s) (inexcusable and deplorable negligence), and canon I(b) (failing to maintain honour and dignity). The striking-off order was affirmed as justified even without dishonesty given the gross negligence and lack of integrity. The US$498,000 restitution order was reduced to US$47,000 with 2% compound interest, and costs of J$750,000 to the complainant were affirmed. (The document also contains Norman Samuels v GLC [2021] JMCA Civ 15, where an attorney was reprimanded for breach of Canon IV(r) and the $800,000 fine was set aside on appeal.)
Duties found breached:
- No conflict between current clients
- Overriding duty to the court
- Uphold public trust in the profession
Aggravating factors:
- Seasoned commercial attorney dealing with a 22-year-old client
- Acted in multiple roles as investment promoter/financial advisor and attorney for both lender and borrower
- Failed to conduct due diligence on overseas entities and individuals
- Wrote false letter (12 Sept 2008) asserting funds had been received and disbursed when untrue
- Caused client funds to be routed through husband's non-trust account; cheque for US$15,000 dishonoured and unpaid
- Serious ongoing harm to complainant; large sum of money lost
Mitigating factors:
- Unblemished disciplinary record over approximately 28 years in practice
- Impressive curriculum vitae and good character evidence
⚠ figures not found verbatim in the source were dropped: ["review_dishonesty_finding_cue_present"]
Documents
Source: https://www.generallegalcouncil.org/judgement/jennifer-jacqueline-housen-complaint-no-75-of-2021/