§ discipline
‹ Browse decisions

Kevin Alexander Long

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number10234/2009
Date01/01/2009
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Client Money, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 31,388
Dishonesty foundYes

Kevin Alexander Long, principal/majority shareholder of Alexanders Solicitors Ltd, was found to have committed widespread Accounts Rules breaches and acted dishonestly - misappropriating client funds, operating an undisclosed business (LAS) taking insurance commissions, making misleading representations to a client (Ms B), and making unexplained client account withdrawals. He was struck off the Roll and ordered to pay costs of £31,387.76 (not enforceable without Tribunal consent). The two co-respondents admitted regulatory breaches but no dishonesty was alleged against them; they were each reprimanded and ordered to pay £5,000 costs each, given their low culpability, cooperation, remedial steps and personal hardship.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Systematic dishonesty including setting up undisclosed business LAS taking 75% of insurance premiums
  • Lied to client Ms B regarding 'irrecoverable shortfall' of ATE premium already recovered in full
  • Unexplained cash withdrawals of £6,000 from client account
  • Concealed activities from co-directors
  • Misuse of clients' funds to assist firm cash flow
  • Minimum cash shortage of £214,166.18

Mitigating factors:

  • For the two reprimanded respondents: no dishonesty, low culpability, they were misled by Long who controlled finances
  • They reported matters to the SRA and cooperated fully
  • They reimbursed affected clients with goodwill payments
  • Personal/health and financial hardship; previously good careers
  • Long was the prime mover and held majority shareholding

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/10234/