§ discipline
‹ Browse decisions

Alison Manning

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number9889/2008
Date01/01/2008
OutcomeS.43 Order (clerks)

Allegation / charges

Failures, Others

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionOther
CostsGBP 6,913
Dishonesty foundNo

Alison Manning, an unadmitted conveyancing clerk employed by Paul Norton & Co (1998-2005), was the subject of a Law Society application under Section 43 of the Solicitors Act 1974. The Tribunal found all six allegations substantiated: she acted for both vendor and purchaser in the sale and resale of property GA while having an undisclosed personal financial interest (including funding the purchase via a personal loan and receiving £4,024.68 as a share of profits), prepared fictitious/sham contract and transfer documents, failed to register the sale or pay stamp duty, kept inaccurate accounting records, and made improper withdrawals causing a shortfall on client account. The Tribunal found she had not behaved as a solicitor's clerk should and that her future employment in the profession should be regulated. It made the Section 43 order and ordered her to pay costs of £6,913.00. The Tribunal substantiated the allegations (including preparation of sham documents) but made no express finding of dishonesty.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Prepared sham/fictitious contract and transfer documentation
  • Undisclosed personal financial interest in transactions in which she acted
  • Improper withdrawals of client money causing a shortfall on client account
  • Dismissed by her employer for gross misconduct

Mitigating factors:

  • A proportion of the costs had been borne by her employer Mr Norton

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/9889/