§ discipline
‹ Back

Samira Mohamed Seth

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number12579/2024
Date12/02/2025
OutcomeFine

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Failures, Recklessness, SRA Principles 2019

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionFine
FineGBP 7,000
CostsGBP 20,000
Dishonesty foundNo

Samira Mohammed Seth, a sole practitioner, COLP and COFA at Seth Law Limited, faced four allegations concerning the firm's handling of mortgage mis-selling claims between 2020 and 2022. She failed to advise clients of alternative redress routes (FOS/FSCS) beyond litigation, failed to send adverse counsel's opinions to ATE insurers (not at all in Client A's case, and over two months late in Client B's case), and failed to seek prior insurer approval before issuing claims, placing clients' ATE cover at risk. She admitted all allegations including recklessness and a lack of integrity. The Tribunal found all allegations proved, including breaches of Principles 2, 5 and 7 and Paragraphs 8.6 and 1.4 of the Code. No dishonesty was alleged or found—only lack of integrity and recklessness. The Tribunal assessed the case as moderately serious and imposed a £7,000 fine, an indefinite restriction order barring sole practice and COLP/COFA roles, and £20,000 costs.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Reckless conduct in relation to Allegations 2 and 3
  • Conduct repeated over a substantial period (c. February 2020 to June 2022)
  • Affected over 500 MMS claims with inadequate oversight
  • Practised in an area outside her expertise without adequate familiarisation
  • Placed clients' ATE insurance cover at financial risk

Mitigating factors:

  • Genuine insight demonstrated
  • Cooperated with the investigation and made admissions
  • No previous regulatory history; 18 years admitted, 12 years operating firm without concerns
  • No direct financial loss to clients identified
  • No personal or financial benefit from the misconduct
  • Operating under significant personal/professional pressures (pandemic, family difficulties, poor health)

Codes & rules applied

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/12579/