§ discipline
‹ Browse decisions

Adrian Gerard Donkin

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number9184/2005
Date01/01/2005
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Client Money, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, Others

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 13,500
Dishonesty foundYes

Sole practitioner and executor took client/estate funds as loans in three matters (Mrs W deceased, Mr B deceased, Miss B) to pay VAT and office expenses while under severe financial pressure. The Tribunal found dishonesty in the cases of Mrs W and Mr B deceased (taking estate money without authority or informing beneficiaries) applying the Twinsectra combined test, but not dishonesty regarding Miss B who consented to her loan. He admitted numerous Accounts Rules breaches, conflict of interest, acting for buyer/seller/lender, and supervision breaches. He was struck off and ordered to pay £13,500 costs.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Took client/estate funds without informing beneficiaries
  • Failed to inform co-executor and parents/guardians of minor beneficiaries
  • One beneficiary reached 21 with no funds available to pay him
  • Increased interest charged to himself to a more advantageous commercial rate
  • Previous disciplinary finding in 1997 (reprimand)
  • Repayment of one loan coincided with FIO inspection
  • Failed to ensure clients took independent advice on loans

Mitigating factors:

  • No intention permanently to deprive; loans repaid with interest
  • No loss to any client or beneficiary
  • Open and transparent recording of loans in books of account; volunteered information to FIO
  • Severe financial and professional difficulties caused largely by former partner's misconduct
  • Paid around £200,000 from own resources to meet debts incurred by others
  • Exceptional character evidence (108 testimonials)
  • De facto suspension of about 20 months following original decision
  • No complaint from clients or beneficiaries

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/9184/