§ discipline
‹ Back

Anis Yusuf Dadu

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number12575/2024
Date27/11/2024
OutcomeReprimand

Allegation / charges

Breaches, SRA Principles 2019

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionReprimand
CostsGBP 14,000
Dishonesty foundNo

Sole director/COLP/COFA of XYZ Law Limited acquired files and work in progress from the failing Notary Express Limited via Notices of Succession (Dec 2020) and failed to notify the Firm's PII insurer of this material alteration, despite the insurer having previously stated it did not wish to absorb any element of Notary Express. He admitted breach of Principle 2 (Allegation 1), which the Tribunal found proved. Allegation 2 alleged he provided false information on an updated PII proposal form (re investigation, significant change, material information) knowing it to be false, with dishonesty and lack of integrity charged. The Tribunal found the information was objectively incorrect/misleading but was not satisfied the Respondent knew it was false, so dismissed Allegation 2 in its entirety, including the dishonesty and integrity allegations. Culpability was assessed as low-to-medium, no actual harm. He was reprimanded and ordered to pay costs of £14,000.

Duties found breached:

Mitigating factors:

  • Genuine insight and apology
  • Admitted breach of Principle 2 in relation to Allegation 1
  • Reflected on misconduct and learnt lessons
  • Reliance on broker Mr Hanif's advice on insurance matters in which he was not well versed
  • Single episode of misconduct
  • No previous disciplinary matters
  • Numerous positive character references

Codes & rules applied

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/12575/